Learned counsel for the petitioner has admitted that to the extent of maintenance allowance order dated 19.07.2002 passed by Respondent No, 2 be maintained but to the extent of granting Rs, 36000/- for dower and Rs, 50000/- as condition mentioned in Nikah-Nama for second marriage, is not permissible under the law and Arbitration Council was not having jurisdiction to entertain the application to this extent and pass the order.
2. Learned counsel for Respondent No, 3 states that Respondent No, 3 will seek her remedy before the Family Court with regard to dower as well as grant of Rs, 50000/- in accordance with the condition mentioned in Nikah-Nama. Further states that the order to the extent of maintenance allowance be maintained.
3. In this view of the matter, the order to the extent of maintenance allowance is maintained but to the extent of grant of dower as well as Rs, 50000/- is set aside. Respondent No, 3 may seek her remedy before the Family Court. In these circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.