Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1981 SCMR 831

NAZIM HUSSAIN vs GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AND Other

Citation1981 SCMR 831
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 917 of 1979
Date1980-12-01
Judge(s)Maulvi Mushtaq Hussain, Shafi-ur-Rehman
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN, J.--The petitioner was appointed as Chief Officer of the Municipal Committee, Jhang, on probation on 17th September, 1976. He continued in service till 17th September, 1978 when his services were dispensed with under rule 13(2) of the West Pakistan Local Councils and Municipal Committees Service Rules, 1963. He was paid one month salary in lieu of one month's notice in accordance with the terms of his appointment. The petitioner felt aggrieved and filed an appeal against the order which vas dismissed by the Punjab Service Tribunal, Lahore, by its order dated 5th September, 1979. Hence this petition for special leave to appeal.

2. Learned counsel has submitted that the service of the petitioner was terminated on political grounds as is clear from the minutes of the meeting of the Provincial Local Government Board held on 19th August, 1978 reproduced at page 21 of the paper book.

We have gone through it and find that although the subject under Item No. 1 was "determination of the cases of persons appointed on political considerations", the record of the minutes does not show that any such consideration prevailed with the Board, inter alia, because Messrs Meraj, Muh4cilt4ad Yasin, Javed Akbar and Abdul Malik who fell in the same category but secured high positions in the merit list and were appointed in Grade 16.

5. The fact remains that the petitioner was appointed on probation for two years and that he was continuing in service on the expiry of this period, as rule 13.3(c) raises a presumption that where the initial period of probation is not extended by a positive action it would be deemed to have been extended for a year. This is clear from Explanation V. It is not denied that the service of the petitioner during the period of probation could be terminated in the manner in which it has been terminated.1 This petition has, therefore, no merit and is dismissed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch