1. ' FAISAL ARAB, J.---The controversy arisen in these revision applications from the proceedings of execution. The respondent has obtained a decree in all the above three cases to the extent of Rs,77,50,000. Thereafter execution application was filed and during pendency of the execution application, the decree holders have given consent that they would not proceed against the minors hence the decretal amount was amended from Rs,77,50,000 to Rs,34,84,281 being 44.37% shares of the major judgment debtors. Thereafter three properties were put to auction and the executing Court issued proclamation of sale. The auction purchaser had given bids for all three properties, separately the offer for house bearing No, A-247, Sector 14-B, Shadman Town, North Karachi, belonging to the widow of deceased was to the extent of Rs,35,00,000 which was sufficient to satisfy the entire amended decretal amount.
2. ' The executing Court rejected the remaining two offers and the only offer pertaining to the aforesaid house was accepted. The auction purchaser deposited the balance sale consideration of the auction and applied for sale certificate which was granted on 3-1-2011.
3. ' The applicant has challenged the issuance of sale certificate in these proceedings on the ground that the auction purchaser is entitled to only 44.37% share in the house and not the entire house. In this regard, learned counsel for the applicant has referred to auction report of the Nazir in order to show that in the said house the auction purchaser has sought a share of 44.37% only.
4. ' It is an admitted position that the decretal amount was reduced from Rs,77,50,000 to Rs,34,84,281 as the decree holder gave consent not to proceed against the judgment debtors who were minors therefore an amount of Rs,34,84,281 only was to be recovered from the sale proceeds of the assets belonging to the deceased judgment debtor or successor-in-interest of the judgment debtor, who were major. In the present case the offer of Rs,35,00,000 was for the entire house, which is in the name of widow of the deceased judgment debtor and no property of minor was put to auction. It is evident that the offer was made for the entire house of the widow of the deceased judgment debtor. The sale was thereafter confirmed on 17-3-2009 which order was not even challenged by the applicant at any stage but only on 3-1-2011 when the sale certificate was issued for the entire house, the same have been challenged in these three revision applications. Reference to 44.37% was referred to the decretal amount only. It was not to share in the house. The offer was for the entire house in order to recover 44.37% of the original decretal amount of Rs,77,50,000 which comes to Rs,34,84,281. Therefore there was no justification to question sale of the entire house. In fact when sale of the entire house was confirmed on 17-3-2009 the same was not challenged in any proceedings which order attained finality. Hence no case is made out. In the circumstances, these three revision applications stand dismissed along with the listed applications.