' MUHAMMAD ANWAARUL HAQ, J.---Through this petition, petitioner Sikandar seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,155 of 2010 dated 24-6-2010, offence under section 365, P.P.C. (subsequently sections 302, 201, 109, 148, 149 were added), registered at Police Station Muhammad Pur District Rajan Pur.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that initially the case was registered under section 365, P.P.C. In which the petitioner was allowed bail by the learned trial court; that there is no incriminating evidence available on the file against the petitioner; that there is a delay A of about three years in lodging of the F.I.R.; that co-accused of the petitioner, namely Hanif has already been granted bail by the learned trial court and case of the petitioner is at par with the case of his co- accused and he is entitled for bail even on the rule of consistency.
3. Complainant Shahab-ud-Din (father of the deceased), present before the Court, identified by the Investigating Officer, does not oppose the grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. Learned Deputy Prosecutor General, in view of the statement of B. The complainant and the bail granting order in favour of co-accused Hanif states that case of the petitioner is not distinguishable than the case of his co-accused, namely Hanif and he does not oppose this bail petition on the ground of consistency.
5. In view of the above, I allow this petition and admit the petitioner to bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs,200,000 (Rupees two hundred thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.
6. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein above are just tentative in nature and strictly confined to the disposal of this bail petition.