Pakistan Case Law← Search
2012 PLC (C.S.) 752

REHANA TASLEEM vs DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, LAYYAH/CHAIRMAN

Citation2012 PLC (C.S.) 752
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petitions Nos.9835 and 5306 of 2010
Date2011-04-21
Judge(s)Muhammad Khalid Mehmood Khan
ResultPetitions dismissed

ORDER

' MUHAMMAD KHALID MEHMOOD KHAN, J.--- Through this single order; I propose to decide two writ petitions i,e, W.P.No,9835 of 2010 and W.P.No,5306 of 2010 as the same question of law is involved in both the writ petitions.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are, petitioners applied for the post of SESE (physical) in District Layyah for different schools; petitioners submitted their applications as they were holding diploma in physical education from Skill Development Council, Islamabad; petitioners were refused to issue interview calls; petitioners submitted applications to respondent No,3 along with educational documents but the respondent refused to accept the diploma granted by Skill Development Council established under National Training Ordinance, 1980 on the ground that issuer institution of diploma is not a recognized institution by the HEC; petitioners through the present writ petitions have prayed that respondent be directed to issue appointment letter to them for the post of Senior Elementary School Educator (Physical) as advertised by them accepting their diploma at par with the other institutions.

3. Notices were issued to respondents who submitted report and parawise comments; they taken the stance that for SESE (Physical) post required educational qualification is as under:- "BA with junior diploma in physical Education or higher professional qualification from a concerned institution."

4. The diploma in physical education is being offered by Government Gulbarg College and Government College Town Ship, Lahore which are the institutions approved by HEC; they operate under the umbrella of University of Punjab; diploma of Skill Development Council is not valid for the post of SESE (Physical Education); Skill Developments not recognized by HEC, nor the Government of Punjab has recognized the institution issuing diplomas; diploma obtained by petitioner does not fulfill the requirements of advertised posts.

5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that Skill Development Council was established under National Training Ordinance, 1980 which was amended vide Ordinance II of 2002 and, as such, petitioners have obtained the diploma from an institution established under the Act or Ordinance and, as such, it is not relevant whether HEC recognized the said institution or not. Petitioners fulfill the basic requirement of post that they are having diploma in physical education and, as such, the refusal on the part of respondents is against the fundamental rights of petitioners.

6. Learned A.A.-G. Submits that petitioners while applying for the posts themselves have admitted that the posts were offered to the persons who have diploma in physical education. The diploma in physical education is being granted by two colleges at Lahore and these colleges alone are recognized by HEC.

7. Heard, record perused.

8. The respondents advertised various posts along with the post of SESE (physical). The petitioners applied for the post of SESE (Physical) and qualification requires for the said post was BA with Junior Diploma in Physical Education or Higher Professional Qualification from the concerned institution. The petitioners having qualification of MA Islamic Studies and MA Punjabi respectively along with diploma in physical education from Skill Development Council, Punjab. The Skill Development Council Punjab is not authorized to impart physical education courses. It is the Higher Education Commission who approves the courses and the institution for imparting the education in different subjects. Physical education is an independent subject and admittedly in Punjab only two colleges are regulating this subject. These two colleges are working under University of Punjab and their certificates/diplomas have been approved by the HEC.

' The argument of learned counsel for petitioner that Skill Development Council is established under Ordinance, 1980 and as such enjoy the status of institution, but it does not mean that this council has the authority to issue certificate to the private colleges or institutions for imparting physical education unless the institution is recognized by HEC or any recognized University. According to law, HFC is the authority to give certificate or approve affiliation of colleges for imparting education all over the Pakistan. No doubt, petitioners are having the diploma of physical education but from the unrecognized institution.

9. The condition precedent for the post offered was that candidates should have the diploma in physical education. The advertisement is very clear that as per clause 15 of the advertisement it is specifically mentioned as under:- {{URDU TEXT}}

10. This clause is specifically shows that it was the condition of the employment offered; that candidates should be equipped with the diploma in physical education granted by the registered charted university or institution recognized by the Higher Education. The petitioners admittedly are not having the diploma from recognized institution or university and, as such, the respondents have rightly refused them to issue call letter or to accept them for the post advertised.

11. In view of above, both the petitions (W.P.No,9835 of 2010 and W.P.No,5306 of 2010) fail and are dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search