' ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, J.---Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that by impugned judgment dated 20-6-2011, the Sindh Service Tribunal at Karachi has set aside order dated 29-10- 2009 and the appellate order dated 18-1-2010, thereby restoring the earlier order dated 15-10-2009 in favour of respondent, which in itself contained following observations:-- "This should not be quoted as precedent by the other officers of Prosecution Branch and this order is made on one time basis under the powers vested to PPO Sindh under P.R.
12.43 and 13.20 (Hardship case). Rule 12.43 reads as under:- "Any of the Rules contained in this Chapter, may for reasons to be recorded in writing be relaxed in individual cases if the competent authority is satisfied that a strict application of the rule would cause hardship to the individual concerned."
2. In view of this position, we deem it appropriate to grant leave to appeal in this case to examine the legality and propriety of the impugned judgment of the Tribunal as well as the order dated 15- 10-2009, which has been restored thereby, .