The petitioner seeks bail after arrest in case FIR No, 1028. dated 29.10.2011, under Sections 392, 411, PPC, registered at Police Station Baghbanpura, District Gujranwala.
2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, it is observed that petitioner was nominated as an accused by the complainant through his supplementary statement on 12.11.2011 whereby he nominated two other accused namely Sabrook alias Sonu and Nadeem Ahmad as well. The petitioner appeared to have been arrested in case FIR No, 1113, dated 29.11.2011, under Sections 302, 402, PPC, registered at police station Baghbanpura (Gujranwala) wherefrom he was taken into custody in the instant case by the police. The petitioner allegedly got recovered cash Rs,40,000/- on 05.12.2011 and a cell phone on 8.12.2011. No memo. of identification has been prepared by the I.O. qua the cell phone so it cannot be said with certainty as to who does it belong to. The complainant relied upon his own knowledge while nominating the petitioner as an accused but he did not disclose the source thereof. The petitioner does not have any previous criminal antecedent. His further incarceration would be of no consequence to the prosecution case. Sufficient reasons exist to believe that petitioner's case calls for further probe into his guilt as envisaged by Section 497(2), Cr.P.C. Therefore, the instant application is allowed and petitioner is admitted to post arrest bail subject to furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs, 2 lacs with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.