' CH. SHAUKAT NAWAZ GORAYA (MEMBER).--- The respondents had filed an application for dismissal of the petition. The copy was delivered to the learned counsel for the petitioner and case was adjourned for filing of the reply to the said application and hearing of arguments.
2. Reply to the application for dismissal of the petition has not been submitted. The learned counsel for the respondents has brought to the notice of this Court that services of the petitioner have been terminated. In this regard he has placed termination letter with the written statement as Annex- R/6. The dues of the petitioner which were calculated to the tune of Rs, 1,308,313 were credited in his Account. Later on out of this amount the petitioner has withdrawn a sum of Rs, 1,300,000. The statement of accounts of the petitioner is Annex-R/12. It is stated by the learned counsel that after his termination the petitioner served a grievance notice upon the management of the respondent- Bank. The copy of the grievance notice is Annex.R/11.
3. In view of the aforementioned circumstances and the documents referred above it becomes crystal clear that the petitioner is no more in the service of the respondents. He assailed his relieving order through the instant petition filed on 3-3-2011. Since the petitioner is no more in service, therefore, no cause of action has remained available to him against the respondents. The petition has become infructuous and cannot proceed.
4. In view of what has been stated above, it is held that petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. There is no order as to costs. The file be consigned to the record room after due completion.