Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2012 MLD 474

MUSARRAT BIBI and 3 others vs MUHAMMAD NAWAZ

Citation2012 MLD 474
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.T.A. No,123-C of 2011,
Date2011-04-07
Judge(s)Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

' IJAZ AHMED CHAUDHRY, C.J.---Through this application under section 25-A of the Family Courts Act, 1964, the petitioners seek transfer of suit for recovery of maintenance allowance titled "Musarrat Bibi and others v. Muhammad Nawaz" filed by them against the respondent, which is pending in the Court of Ms. Samina Asad, Judge Family Court, Gujranwala, to any Court of competent jurisdiction at Mandi Baha ud Din, on the grounds that now both the parties are residing at Mandi Baha ud Din; and petitioner No,1 being a Parda Nasheen lady is facing hardships while appearing before the learned Judge Family Court at Gujranwala.

2. On the other hand, learned counsel _appearing on behalf of the respondent has vehemently opposed this application on the grounds that the respondent is a permanent resident of Gujranwala; that cause of action had accrued to the petitioner at Gujranwala and she herself had filed suit at Gujranwala; that according to the addresses mentioned in the suit both the parties are the residents of Gujranwala; that the petitioner has obtained an ex parte decree with mala fide intention; that the respondent has moved an application for setting aside the said ex parte decree which is pending before the learned Judge Family Court, Gujranwala; and that it is not a valid ground that now the petitioner is living at Mandi Baha ud Din and the petitioner has sought transfer of the suit just to create difficulties for the respondent.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record. It has been noticed that in the annexure-A, which has been annexed by the petitioner herself with this petition, the addresses of both the parties are of Gujranwala. The petitioner has obtained an ex parte decree against the respondent and after coming to know about the said decree the respondent has filed an application seeking setting aside of the same, which is pending in the same Court at Gujranwala and the matter is likely to be decided within a short span of time. The petitioner herself has chosen to file the suit at Gujranwala and this Court is not supposed to oblige a lady merely for the reason that she is no more residing at the given address after filing of the suit. Therefore, for the said reasons no useful purpose would be served to transfer the suit at the request of the petitioner.

Consequently, this petition having no force is dismissed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch