Abdus Sattar Asghar, J.--Appellant Muhammad Siddique along with other co-accused namely Muhammad Yaseen, Sher Muhammad and Allah Wasaya alias Wassu was tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Haroonabad Camp at Fortabbas in case FIR No, 67/2007, dated 12.05.2007 under Sections 302/34/449/324 PPC, Police Station Marot, Tehsil Fortabbas for causing murder of Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi and also for causing murderous assault upon Mst.
Irshad Bibi injured PW by inflicting fire-arm injuries. The learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 11.03.2009 holding him guilty convicted the appellant Muhammad Siddique under Section 302(b) PPC and sentenced to death on two counts and also directed to pay an amount of Rs, 50,000/- on each count as compensation to the legal heirs of Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi deceased, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for six months on each count. He was also convicted under Section 324 PPC and sentenced to. undergo R.I. for seven years as Ta'zir for causing injuries to Mst. Irshad Bibi along with fine of Rs, 40,000/- to be paid to said Irshad Bibi if realized and in default to further undergo six months SI. He was also convicted under Section 449 PPC and sentenced to R.I. for ten years as Ta'zir along with fine of Rs, 15000/- and in default to further undergo S.I. for six months. By virtue of the same judgment his accused namely Allah Wasaya alias Wassu, Sher Muhammad and Muhammad Yasin were acquitted of the charges.
2. Muhammad Siddique convict has impugned the above noted convictions and sentences through the instant appeal, whereas the State has approached this Court with Murder Reference No, 14 of 2009 seeking confirmation of death sentences awarded to him. We intend to dispose of both the matters together being inter-connected through this single judgment.
3. Prosecution case as unfolded by the complainant Muhammad Akrarn in the FIR (Exh.PF) registered on the basis of his statement recorded on 12.5.2007 at 3:30 a.m., is that he is resident of Chak No, 310/HR and is Zamindar; that his brothers Ghulam Hussain and Muhammad Tariq reside with his parents at Allama Iqbal Colony Chak No, 313/HR; that eight years back his brother Ghulam Hussain wedded Mst. Irshad Bibi daughter of Rahim Bakhsh resident of Chak No, 310/HR and in her exchange his sister Mst. Nasira Bibi was wedded to Muhammad Yasin son of Rahim Bakhsh; that about 4/5 years back Mst. Irshad Bibi went to her parents due to estrangement with Ghulam Hussain. Consequently Mst. Nasira Bibi also reported to her parents; that a few days back a compromise was effected between Mst. Irshad Bibi and Ghulam Hussain with the intervention of brotherhood as a result whereof four days back Rahim Bakhsh left his daughter Mst. Irshad Bibi to the house of Ghulam Hussain; that today since evening time he along with his Khalu Ghulam Ali resident of Chak No 423/HR were available in the house of his father at Chak No, 313/HR and went to sleep there at night; that. at about 2:30 a.m. Muhammad Siddique (appellant) armed with rifle, and Allah Wasaya alias Wassu trespassed into the house due to his illicit relations with Mst. Irshad Bibi and attempted to awake her whereupon Ghulam Hussain woke up and raised hue and cry, consequently Muhammad Siddique fired a shot upon Ghulam Hussain; that on reporting of the fire-shots he, his brother Muhammad Tariq and Ghulam Ali also woke up and identified the accused in the light of lantern; that Ghulam Hussain in running position took refuge behind the trolley in the Courtyard, however accused Allah Wasaya dragged him by holding from legs and Muhammad Siddique fired the second shot upon Ghulam Hussain which hit him on neck; that Mst.
Irshad Bibi and Mst. Nasira Bibi attempted to rescue Ghulam Hussain' whereupon Muhammad Siddique fired a shot which hit Mst. Irshad Bibi on her backside and abdomen and the other fire- shot hit on her left arm and Mst. Nasira Bibi also received fire shot; that he along with PWs attempted to apprehend the accused who pointing fire-arm towards them caused threats to kill and decamped from the spot; that he alongwith PWs attended the injured whereas Ghulam Hussain succumbed to the injuries at the spot.
4. Before proceeding further in the matter, we may mention that in order to avoid burdening this judgment with unnecessary details we would confine ourselves only to the facts necessary for disposal of this appeal.
5. Amjad Rasheed, SI (PW-14), scribe of the FIR and first Investigating Officer of this case, deposed that after recording the FIR Exh.PF on the statement of Muhammad Akram complainant he reached the spot along with police officials, inspected the place of occurrence, prepared rough sketch (Exh.PM) of the scene of occurrence and also prepared the inquest report (Exh.PE) of Ghulam Hussain (deceased) and injury statements of Mst. Nasira Bibi then injured (later deceased) and of Mst. Irshad Bibi injured and handed over the dead-body of the deceased Ghulam Hussain to Zafar Iqbal 566/C for its transmission to the mortuary for post-mortem examination and the injured were shifted to Rural Health Centre Marot for treatment. He also obtained the bloodstained earth beneath the dead-body of Ghulam Hussain and bloodstained earth pertaining to the injuries of Mst. Nasira Bibi and Mst. Irshad Bibi vide recovery memo. Exh.PG. He collected three empty cartridges (P-7/1-3) from the place of occurrence which were taken into possession vide recovery memo. Exh.PH and sealed into parcel and recorded the statements of the recovery witnesses under Section 161 Cr.P.C. On 13.05.2007 on receipt of information regarding the death of Mst. Nasira Bibi who was admitted in B.V. Hospital, Bahawalpur, he went to the Hospital and brought her dead- body to RHC Marot for postmortem examination and prepared her inquest report (Exh.PK/3). On 14.05.2007 on receipt of MLC of Mst. Irshad Bibi and Nasira Bibi he annexed the same with record. On 21.05.2007 he recorded the statement of Mst. Irshad Bibi PW in B.V. Hospital Bahawalpur when she gained her senses and thereafter on 28.5.2007 upon his transfer to Police Station Saddar Haroonabad handed over the police file to Mobarrir.
6. Safdar Hussain SI (PW-13) the other Investigating Officer of this case investigated the appellant Muhammad Siddique and Allah Wasaya on 21.06.2007. During investigation Muhammad Siddique got recovered the offence weapon rifle .444-bore (P.8) along with six live cartridges (P.9/1-6) from the room of his residential house lying in an iron box, which were taken into, possession vide recovery memo. Exh.PI, sealed it into a parcel for onward transmission to the Forensic. Science Laboratory for analysis, recorded the statements of Moharrir and Constable who transmitted the recovered articles to the office of Forensic Science Laboratory and Chemical Examiner. He prepared incomplete challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C.
7. On submission of the challan, learned trial Court formally charge-sheeted the above named accused including the appellant on 29.11.2008 under Sections 302/34/449/324 PPC to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
8. Prosecution produced as many as 14 witnesses to prove the charges. Muhammad Akram complainant (PW-8), Mst. Irshad Bibi injured witness (PW-11), Ghulam Ali eye-witness (PW-9), Dr. Muhammad Sajjad (PW-7) and Lady Doctor Fauzia Rafique (PW-10) are material witnesses and the other PWs are formal in nature.
9. After concluding the prosecution evidence the learned trial Court examined the appellant and other accused under Section 342 Cr.P.C. The appellant pleading his innocence rejected each piece of prosecution evidence, however in reply to question "Why this case against you and why the PWs have deposed against you" he replied as under:-- "Ghulam. Hussain deceased and his wife Mst. Irshad Bibi had strained relations with each other and due to this both families nourished grudge against each other as Mst. Nasira Bibi was married to Muhammad Yaseen accused. I have no concern with both the parties as I belong to different caste/brothery and I have no motive to commit the murder of anybody. In fact it was a blind murder and nobody had witnessed the occurrence. PWs produced by the prosecution are residents of different villages which are at a distance of about 20 to 30 kilometers from the place of occurrence. Parents of Mst. Irshad Bibi wife of deceased reside in my Chak who had personal grudge against me. Receiving information about this blind occurrence, parents of Mst. Irshad Bibi finding an opportunity involved me in this case as the real culprit is not known to anybody yet. Mst.
Irshad Bibi implicated me in this case on the asking of her parents as her parents had extended threats to me prior to this occurrence that they will soon teach me a lesson. FIR was lodged after due meditation and consultation which shows the mala fide on the part of prosecution. In fact FIR was lodged much later than shown in the record as police was connived with the complainant party and the Roznamcha of police was kept blank till meditation and consultation. PWs and complainant are related inter-se. So they deposed against me falsely."
10.Learned counsel for the appellant argued that he is falsely implicated with malice; that he has no concern with both the parties and have no motive at all to commit the alleged double murder; that it was a blind murder; that the PWs are residents of other villages situated at considerable distance from the place of occurrence; that Mst. Irshad Bibi PW resident of his village, having personal grudge has falsely involved him in this case on the asking of her parents who had extended, threats to him before this occurrence that they would teach him a lesson; that the FIR was lodged after consultation with due deliberations with the connivance of police at some later stage; that the PWs are not in line and corroborative to each other, rather they advanced different versions as regards the details of the occurrence while introducing different sets of accused; that the PWs being closely related to each other as well as to the deceased have deposed false; that motive alleged by the complainant is not established against the appellant; that the medical evidence is at variance to the ocular account failing to furnish any reliable corroboration; that the site-plan also fails to corroborate the complainant's version regarding implication of the appellant; that it was a dark-night occurrence; that the recoveries alleged at the spot as well as pertaining to the offence weapon are fake, fabricated and planted upon the appellant; that the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory also fails to furnish any corroboration to the ocular account; that the prosecution has not been able to prove the charges against the appellant, beyond any reasonable doubt through any confidence inspiring, and reliable ocular or documentary account therefore the impugned convictions and sentences are untenable in the eye of law and liable to set aside.
11.Conversely, the learned Deputy Prosecutor General assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant vehemently argued that the prosecution has established the charges against the appellant to the hilt with the help of testimonies of Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11), Muhammad Akram complainant and eye-witness (PW-8) and Ghulam Ali another eye-witness. (P.W-9); that the testimonies of the PWs are in line and corroborative to each other with regard to the complicity of Muhammad Siddique appellant for causing murder of Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi as well as murderous assault upon Mst. Irshad Bibi by effective fire-arm injuries; that the medical evidence as well as the recovery of offence, weapon duly matched with the empty cartridges found from the spot vide report of the Forensic Science Laboratory (Exh.PO) furnish sufficient independent corroboration to the reliable and confidence inspiring ocular account which cannot be discarded merely on the ground of close relationship of the PWs with the deceased; that absence or non-establishing of the motive is not fatal to the prosecution case fully proved 'against the appellant with regard to his complicity resulting into his conviction; that in the absence of any mitigating circumstance the learned trial Court has rightly convicted the accused/appellant with capital penalty of death for causing willful murder of Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi as well as for causing murderous assault upon Mst. Irshad Bibi injured PW; that in the attending circumstances the appellant does not deserve any leniency in quantum of punishment and the appeal is liable to dismissal.
12.We have given patient hearing to the counsel for the parties and the learned DPG for the State.
13.Careful appraisal and comparative analysis of testimonies of Muhammad Akram complainant/eye-witness (PW-8), Ghulam All eyewitness (PW-9) and Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) reveals that they are in line and corroborative to each other on vital dimensions of this case with regard to complicity of Muhammad Siddique appellant as under:--
(i) Muhammad Akram complainant/eye-witness (PW-8) is real brother of Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi both deceased. Simultaneously Ghulam Ali eye-witness (PW-9) is real Khaloo of the deceased as well as of the complainant. Admittedly Muhammad Akram complainant (PW-8), resides at Chak No, 310/HR at a distance of four kilometer from the place of occurrence.
Simultaneously Ghulam All eye-witness (PW-9) resides at. Chak No, 423/HR at a distance of 15/20 K.M. from the place of occurrence. The occurrence took place at Chak No, 313/HR where father of the complainant' alongwith the deceased and other family members permanently reside.
Muhammad Akram complainant (PW-8) as well as Ghulam All (PW-9) have furnished and explained believable and plausible reasons of their presence at the time and place of occurrence that they had come to see Mst, Khairan Bibi ailing grand-mother of the complainant at about Maghrib time and stayed there at night when the occurrence took place. Both the said PWs have narrated, the occurrence in line to each other regarding complicity of Muhammad Siddique appellant by causing fire-arm injuries to Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi both deceased and Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) supported by the medical evidence, therefore, their presence at the time and place of occurrence cannot be doubted, in the circumstances of this case. Reliance be made upon Shamshad Ali Vs. The State (2011 SCM R 1394).
(ii)Simultaneously Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) in her examination-in-chief categorically stated that Muhammad Siddique appellant armed with rifle made fire-shot hitting on the left arm of Ghulam Hussain and another fire-shot hitting on the neck of Ghulam Hussain deceased. She further deposed that Muhammad Siddique appellant also made fire-shots hitting on her back and left arm and that Mst. Nasira Bibi sister of Ghulam Hussain (deceased) stepped forward to his rescue whereupon Muhammad Siddique appellant made fire-shot hitting at the neck of Mst. Nasira Bibi. She also. deposed that Ghulam Hussain succumbed to the injures at the spot whereas she along with Mst. Nasira Bibi were shifted to B.V. Hospital Bahawalpur for treatment where Mst. Nasira Bibi succumbed to injuries and she herself remained admitted in the Hospital for, about three- months for treatment. This part of the statement of Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) therefore furnishes sufficient, corroboration to the prosecution version as set-forth by Muhammad Akram complainant (PW-8) as well as corroborated by Ghulam Ali eye-witness (PW-9). There is no reason at all to disbelieve Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) with regard to complicity of Muhammad Siddique appellant for commission of the offence.
(iii)Learned counsel for the appellant has laid much emphasis on his argument that it was a dark- night occurrence wherein identification of the accused was doubtful. In this regard suffices to say that Muhammad Akram complainant/eye-witness (PW-8) and Ghulam Ali eyewitness (PW-9) both were cross-examined by the defence on this point. Both the said witnesses have categorically stated during cross-examination that a lantern was litting in the Courtyard at the time of occurrence. They have also stated that Muhammad Siddique convict/appellant was already well- known to them and they had correctly identified the accused person at the time of occurrence.
Mere fact that the lantern was not produced to the Investigating Officer during the investigation is no reason to detract the evidentiary value of the PWs with regard to identification of Muhammad Siddique appellant. It is observed that the appellant Muhammad Siddique is resident of the village of Mst. Irshad Bibi injured PW therefore his identification by the PWs at the time of occurrence cannot be doubted at all. Reliance be made upon Mst. Shamim Akhtar vs. Fiaz Akhtar and two others (PLD 1992 SC 211).
14. Fire-arm injuries causing death of Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi as well as on the person of Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11), are fully corroborated by the medical evidence produced by the prosecution in the shape of Dr. Muhammad Sajjad (PW-7) and Lady Doctor Fauzia Rafique (PW-10).
Dr. Muhammad Sajjad (PW-7) conducted the post-mortem examination on the dead-body of Ghulam Hussain and found following injuries on his body:-- "1&2 A black circular penetrating wound with inverted margins of about 11A cm in diameter on right cheek approximately two CM below and medial to right temporomanduibilar joint. Blackening and tattooing was present. Clotted blood was present within and around the wound. Another wound of about 3 x 2 cm with everted margins on the left side of neck approximately at the posterior border of posterior triangle of neck at the level of C-4 and C-5 vertebra. Clotted blood was present within and around the wound.
3. There was a circular penetrating wound of about 11A cm with inverted, margins on the lateral side of left arm approximately 06 cm above to elbow joint, blackening and tattooing was present, clotted blood was present within and around the wound. There was another circular wound of about 3cm x 2cm with everted margins on the medial side of left arm approximately 02 cm above to elbow Joint. Clotted blood was present within and around the wound.
CHORAX All visceras of thorax were normal and healthy.
ABDOMEN All visceras of abdomen were normal and healthy.
MUSCLES, BONES AND JOINTS Injury Nos, 1 and 2 caused fracture of C-4 and C-5 vertebra alongwith spinal cord at the level and meningies at that level.
Injury No, 3 caused fracture of humerus of left arm at the distil end.
REMARKS There were four wound, all of which were ante-mortem and homicidal caused by fire-arm. In my opinion, the death was due to neurogenie shock or haemorrhage to vital organ (spinal cord) which was sufficient to cause death in ordinary course of nature. All the injuries were ante-mortem and homicidal caused by firearm."
Probable, time between injuries and death was instantaneous. Probable time between death and post-mortem was within eight hours."
He also verified the post-mortem report Exh.PD with pictorial diagram Exh.PD/1 recorded in his own hand bearing his seal, and signatures. He also attested the inquest report prepared by the police with his signatures.
15.Lady Doctor Fauzia Rafique (PW-10) on 12.5.2007 medically examined Mst. Nasira Bibi in injured condition and recorded the following injuries on her body vide MLC Report Exh.PJ prepared by her in her hand which bear her signatures:--
1. There was a lacerated wound due to fire-arm injury in front of neck at mid-point with inverted margins blackening and tattooing etc. were present measuring 1 x 1cm going back straight through the neck and an exit wound behind neck in the mid-point with everted margins measuring 2.5 x 3.0 cm in size. General condition of the injured was very poor with pale face. Patron of respiration was changing. Blood pressure was lowering with indicated internal bleeding from the wound as well as external on the back of neck. First aid was provided and injured was referred to BVH Bahawalpur (COD for management and surgical intervention if any feasible). The wound was dangerous to life within 21/2 to 31/2 hours and was due to fire-arm injury."
16.On 13.05.2007 she also conducted the post-mortem examination on the dead-body of Mst.
Nasira Bibi indicating the same injuries as mentioned in her MLC with the fallowing remarks: "REMARKS In my opinion death had occurred due to fire-arm injury which resulted in excessive bleedings as well as damage to vital structures like trachea and oesophagus and spinal canal containing spinal cord. Moreover bleeding in the trachea may had resulted in trickling of blood in the air passages and ultimately their obstruction. Probable time between injury and death 24 to 30 hours and between death and post-mortem 04 to 6 hours".
She also verified the post-mortem report Exh.PK, pictorial diagram Exh. PK/1, injury statement Exh.PK/2 and inquest report Exh.PK/3 prepared by the police bearing her attesting signatures.
17. On 12.05.2007 she also medically examined Mst. Irshad Bibi (PW-11) wife of Ghulam Hussain (deceased) and recorded the following injuries:-- "1. There was a lacerated wound in front of abdomen near epigastric area with everted margins with profused bleedings due to fire-arm injury. This seems to be exit wound due to fire-arm injury measuring 2 x 2.5 cm in diameter approximately.
2. There was a lacerated wound due to fire-arm injury approximately at the middle of left forearm also due to fire-arm injury profusedly bleeding.
3. There was a lacerated wound on back of trunk with inverted margins approximately lx1 cm in size, tattooing and blackening were present. It seems to be entry wound of fire-arm injury as excessive bleeding had occurred, so patient was referred to BVH, BWP (COD) surgical unit, for management and final report will be in light of surgical notes after surgical intervention at BVH Bahawalpur.
FINAL REPORT FOR INJURY NOS. 1 and 3 Both due to one cartoos. After receiving the treatment notes from surgical Ward No, III BVH Bahawalpur where exploratory laparotomy and chest intubation was done. Case of fire-arm confirmed and no bullet or pellet etc. recovered as they had passed across the body, so declared as Jurh Jaifa.
FOR INJURY NO. 2 As there was no bony fracture and only muscles had been turn. So declared as Jurh Ghair Jaifa Mutlahima. All the injuries were due to fire-arm and duration of injuries was 2(1/2) to 3(1/2) hours and these were declared as dangerous to life.
MLC report Exh. PL is correct carbon copy of my original report which is in my hand and bears my seal and signature. I also signed injury statement prepared by the police which is Exh. PL/1."
18. Bare reading of the aforementioned medical evidence produced by the prosecution transpires that it furnishes sufficient corroboration to the ocular account advanced by the prosecution regard to nature and location of fire-arm injuries caused by Muhammad Siddique appellant to Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi both deceased and Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) as alleged by the prosecution. Despite searching cross-examination nothing material elicited in favour of the defence to detract its corroborative evidentiary value.
19. Learned counsel for the appellant has vehemently argued that presence of blackening and tattooing on the injuries of Ghulam Hussain deceased observed by Dr. Muhammad Sajjad (PW-7) in his post-mortem report falsify the prosecution version. In our considered opinion the learned counsel for the appellant is misconceived. It is notworthy that during cross-examination upon both the eye-witnesses as well as upon the injured witness Mst. Irshad Bibi (PW-11) defence side has miserably failed to ask any question with regard to inter-se distance of the appellant/convict as well as both the deceased and the injured PW. It is pertinent to mention that no such distance is mentioned in the site-plan. Mere fact that the Investigating Officer has not shown the inter-se distance of the appellant and the injured and the deceased persons at the time of occurrence in the site-plan is not fatal to the prosecution case, otherwise fully established with the help of trustworthy ocular account corroborated by medical evidence. Reliance be placed upon Muhammad Hanif vs. The State (PLD 1993 SC 895). Needless to mention that the site-plan is not a substantive piece of evidence in terms of Article 22 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Reliance be made upon the case of Mst. Shamim Akhar Supra. Therefore this argument of the learned counsel for the appellant is devoid of any force and thus repelled.
20. Recovered crime empties (P. 7/1-3) during inspection of the place of occurrence on 12.5.2007 by Amjad Rasheed SI (PW-14) first Investigating Officer and taken into possession vide recovery memo. Exh. PH duly attested by the recovery witnesses were transmitted to the Forensic Science Laboratory on 29.5.2007 by Bashir Ahmad 405/HC (PW-4). Offence weapon rifle .44-bore (P.8) got recovered by the appellant Muhammad Siddique on 21.6.2007 was later on transmitted to the Forensic Science Laboratory by Muhammad Ashraf 1138/C (PW-6) for comparison with the already transmitted crime empties. Report of the Forensic Science Laboratory Lahore dated 6.8.2007 (Exh.
PO) manifests that the crime empties C/2 and C/3 had been fired from rifle .44-bore. However crime empty C/1 reportedly found not fired from the rifle .44-bore. It is sufficiently established point of law that expert report of the Forensic Science Laboratory is merely a supportive piece of evidence. Therefore non-matching of one of the crime empties with the offence weapon has no fatal effect upon arrangement and complicity of the appellant already established to the hilt with the help of truthful and trustworthy ocular account comprising eye-witnesses including Mst. Irshad Bibi (PW-11). Therefore, even recovery of offence weapon and crime empties bearing substantial support from the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory furnish considerable corroboration to the prosecution version.
21.Learned counsel for the appellant in his arguments has much relied upon the fact that Mst.
Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) had lodged a private complaint implicating her co-wife Mst. Faizan Bibi, Nawaz brother of Mst. Faizan and Mukhtar cousin of said Faizan Bibi and Muhammad Siddique (appellant) instead of Muhammad Yasin, Sher Muhammad and Allah Wasaya alias Wassu co- accused nominated by the complainant. It is noteworthy that the said private complaint was rejected outright by the trial Court. Lodging of the private complaint by Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW- 11) is understandable. Admittedly Muhammad Yasin co-accused (since acquitted) is real brother of Mst. Irshad. Simultaneously Allah Wasaya and Sher Muhammad co-accused (both acquitted) are also related to her. It is understandable that by filing the private complaint she made an attempt to save her real brother and relatives and instead implicated her co-wife Mst. Faizan Bibi along with her real brother and cousin perhaps due to a bit natural rivalry between co-wives. However fact remains that she did not exonerate Muhammad Siddique (appellant) as actual assailant at any stage. Substitution of co-accused by Mst. Irshad Bibi (PW-11) in such circumstances is not fatal to her credibility regarding arraignment of Muhammad Siddique appellant. For this reason her testimony cannot he rendered as doubtful following the golden principle of "separating the grain from the chaff'. Needless to mention that doctrine of "falsus in uno falsus in ombibus" is not followed in criminal justice system being practiced in our country. Reliance be made on Sarfraz alias Sappi and 2 others vs. The State (2000 SCM R 1758). Therefore argument of the learned counsel for the appellant is devoid of any force and repelled accordingly.
22.Another argument of learned counsel for the appellant that the PWs being inter-se related are interested witnesses is also devoid of force. An 'interested witness' is one who has a motive to falsely implicate the accused due to some grudge, partisan or animosity. It is noteworthy that the defence side has not suggested any such reason of his false implication during cross-examination upon the PWs. Therefore, this argument of learned counsel for the appellant is also without any substance and of no avail. Reliance is made upon Ashfaq Ahmad us. The' State (2007 SCM R 641).
23.It is also argued with full force by learned counsel for the appellant that motive as indicated by the complainant that Muhammad Siddique appellant had illicit relations with Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) and was unhappy on her return to the house of her husband Ghulam Hussain (deceased) is not established on the record. Although Muhammad Akram complainant (PW-8) and Ghulam Ali (PW-9) have reiterated the above said motive in their examination-in-chief, however the same cannot' be termed as concrete evidence to prove it. It is important to note that inadequacy, weakness or failure to prove the motive by the prosecution remains immaterial to extend any benefit to the murderer with regard to non-awarding of normal penalty of death or to reduce the sentence of capital punishment of death to lesser punishment especially when his arraignment has been fully established with confidence inspiring and truthworthy ocular account corroborated by medical evidence and recoveries. Therefore, this argument of the learned counsel for the appellant is also devoid of force. Reliance be made upon Mumraiz us. The State (2011 SCM R 1153).
24.Nutshell of the above discussion is that prosecution in this case has successfully brought the guilt home to the appellant Muhammad Siddique with the help of truthworthy eye-witnesses who have furnished reasonable explanation of their presence at the time and place of occurrence including injured PW Mst. Irshad Bibi corroborated by medical evidence and recoveries. There is no misreading or non-reading of material evidence available on record. Therefore, charges of willful murder of Ghulam Hussain and Mst. Nasira Bibi as well as murderous assault upon Mst. Irshad Bibi injured (PW-11) by causing fire-arm injuries are proved to the hilt against the appellant Muhammad Siddique beyond any reasonable doubt. Learned trial Court therefore has rightly convicted the appellant in the offences under Sections 302(b)/324/449 PPC. Simultaneously in the absence of any extenuating/mitigating circumstances appellant's complicity with regard to double murder as well as murderous assault upon injured PW Mst. Irshad Bibi does not call for any lenient view to reduce the normal penalty of death and other sentences awarded by the learned trial Court in the circumstances of this Case.
25.For the above discussion and reasons, convictions and sentences awarded to the appellant are maintained and the appeal is dismissed. Death sentence are confirmed and Murder Reference is answered in positive.