The petitioner seeks his post arrest bail in a case registered against him vide F.I.R No, 76 dated 17.04.2011 under Sections 3/4 of Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd), Order IV of 1979, at Police Station Abdul Hakeem District Khanewal.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the case is false and that the petitioner has no previous record and the offences do not fail under the prohibitory clause.
3. On the other hand, the learned A.P.G opposed the petition.
4. Arguments heard. Record perused.
5. The record shows that the petitioner was arrested on 17.04.2011 and was sent to judicial lock up on the same day and thus is no more required by the police and he is behind the bars for about six months. The petitioner is previously non-convict. The offences do not fall under the prohibitory clause, so no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars for an indefinite period. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and the petitioner Muhammad Ramzan is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs, 1,00,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.