' MAZHAR IQBAL SIDHU, J.---It is, a case wherein a legal professional i.e Advocate Mian Shahbaz Ali of Sheikhupura has been assassinated in his hey days on account of his objecting to the petitioner personating him as a lawyer by becoming an eye-witness in a case lodged against him vide F.I.R.
No,1336 dated 3-10-2011 under sections 420, 468, 471, P.P.C. At Police Station Islampura District Lahore on the written complaint of Muhammad Tariq Khan; Advocate at that time the petitioner intimidated the deceased that he would see him and on the following day owing to his conspiracy his co-accused Muhammad Imran, Muhammad Shehzad alias Sajjad and Irfan real brothers of the petitioner along with two unknown persons caused multiple fire arm injuries to Mian Shehbaz Ali when he was proceeding towards Katchery, Sheikhupura being injured on the way to D.H.Q., Hospital Sheikhupura he succumbed.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner was not present at the time and place of occurrence; the alleged threats extended by the petitioner to the deceased are of vague nature and besides the deceased, the cc applicant and other P. Ws. Were also shown in the earlier case lodged against the petitioner as mentioned op-cit but none of them was caused any physical harm; no date, time and place of {{TABLE }} the conspiracy/abetment has been mentioned in the instant F.I.R. But subsequently, the statements of two persons were manoeuvred by the police; petitioner is in lock-up since 14-10-2011 his involvement needs further inquiry and investigation is complete, therefore, petitioner is entitled for the grant of bail.
3. Learned D.P.-G. Assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the submissions by contending that it is very much mentioned in the F.I.R. That the petitioner warned the deceased on his involvement as being impersonator as an Advocate till tomorrow and this ultimatum given by the petitioner was consequently got completed by him through his co- accused. It has further been submitted that during the investigation two P. Ws. Namely Muhammad Tariq Cheema and Muhammad Tehseen Buzmi appeared before the Investigating Officer on 4-10- 2011 and explicitly made statements detailing about the conspiracy/abetment involving the petitioner and have categorically said that the peiitioner in their presence directed his co-accused who are his brothers Imran and others that the deceased be taught a lesson and in this way sufficient material is available on the record as the earlier fact of involvement of the petitioner is connected with the fact of murder of Mian Shehbaz Ali, Advocate deceased of the instant case. It has further been argued that the petitioner is involved earlier in about 24 cases of fraud registered in different police stations; by. Concluding the arguments prayer for dismissal of bail has been made.
4. Heard. Record perused.
5. F.I.R. Goes to show that the petitioner was pointed out as a fake Advocate by the deceased and in the company of witnesses, F.I.R. Of cheating-cum-fraud was registered at Police Station Islampura, Lahore, as mentioned op-c it, the petitioner intimidated the deceased that till tomorrow i,e, 4-10-2011 the deceased would be taught a lesson and he asked his co-accused Muhammad Imran etc. To teach a lesson to Mian Shehbaz Ali, Advocate. It has been found that co-accused of the petitioner are his real brothers and they have fulfilled the command of petitioner by committing the murder. Statements of Muhammad Tariq Cheema and Muhammad Tehseen Buzmi are available on the record to connect the petitioner with the commission of conspiracy/abetment to murder. Petitioner has been found involved in 24 criminal cases registered at different police stations detail of the same is penned down infra:-- Sr. No F.I.R. No, Offence under P.P.C.Police Station 1 136 of 2011 406 Islampura, Lahore 2 349 of 2008 420/468/471/506 -do- 3 353 of 2008 324/186,PPC and 7 A.T.A-do- 4 744 of 2006 420/468/471 Islampura 5 115 of 2008 -do- -do- 6 1027 of 2007 406 PPC Gulshan Ravi 7 430 of 2007 420/506 A/division, Sheikhupura 8 288 of 2006 420/468/471/406 -do- 9 816 of 2004 420/468 Lower Mall 10 27 of 2005 -do- Northern Cantt 11 1147 of 2006 419/420/468/471 -do- 12 26 of 2001 324/148/149 Safdarabad, Sheikhupura 13 1127 of 2006 406 A/division 14 68 of 2006 420/468/411 ACE, Lahore 15 6 of 2006 419/420/468 and 5/2/41 PPAACE, Punjab 16 135 of 2008 342/506/147/149 Islampura, Lahore 17 344 of 2008 420/478/48/506 -do- 18 347 of 2008 406/506 Ghalib Market 19 474 of 2008 471/468/506 Gulshan Ravi 20 204 of 2009 420/406 Naseerabad 21 47 of 2010 447/511/506 Ghalib Market 22 1157 of 2011 302/109/148/149 Sadar, Sheikhupura 23 1136 of 2011 420/468/471 Islampura 24 173 of 2004 -do- Lower Mall 25 494 of 2006 -do- Islampura
6. The petitioner is a hardened, desperate and dangerous criminal, therefore, no case for the grant of bail is made out, hence, the instant application is dismissed.