1. I have gone through the record and heard both the parties.
2. Khalid Hussain Shah, claimant alleged that he purchased maize seeds worth of Rs. 4500/- from the defendant but the same were found defective and it could not give desired crop despite incurring other charges in order to get proper results and produce. He claimed that he had to suffer a lot due to defective seeds supplied by the defendant. According to him, he was entitled to get Rs.
3. 1,38,000/- as expenses incurred on the purchase of seeds and subsequent loss sustained by him because of poor results.
4. The defendant submitted that the claimant had no proof to the fact that he had purchased seeds from him or from his authorized dealer.
5. During hearing, the claimant present in the court admitted that he had purchased seeds from one Rana Mehmood and not directly from the defendant. Significantly, the said Rana Mehmood has not been impleaded in the case as party nor his name was mentioned in the claim. It was admitted by the claimant himself in the claim that despite purchase of seeds, he had not been issued any receipt. Since receipt regarding purchase of maize seeds from the defendant was neither received nor mentioned in the claim nor person from whom, those seeds were purchased, was impleaded in the case as party, therefore, the claim was not likely to succeed even if the evidence is recorded.
6. Thus, to proceed further in the matter, is the wastage of time. The claim being baseless and misconceived is hereby dismissed. Since the claim is dismissed at initial stage therefore, no order as to fine is passed.