1. ' TASSADUQ HUSSAIN JILLANI, J.---Petitioner-defendant initially was a tenant in the ejectment petition filed by the respondent-landlord, however, during the pendency of the appeal he purchased half of the suit property and thereby became a co-sharer. The grievance being made is that despite the afore-referred development and the law laid down by this Court in the judgments reported as MST. SANOBAR SULTAN AND OTHERS v. OBAIDULLAH KHAN (PLD 2009 SC 71). And ABDUL ZAHIR v. JAFFAR KHAN (2010 SCM R 189), he has concurrently been ejected which is not tenable in law.
2. ' When confronted with the query as to whether the petitioner is prepared to have the suit property partitioned, he readily agreed and suggested that let the respondent be summoned and this matter could be resolved even on the next date of hearing. heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length, leave is granted inter alia to consider whether having purchased half share of the suit property was the petitioner-defendant not entitled to retain the possession of the joint property till partition and could be ejected in the proceedings culminating in the impugned judgment. As it is a rent matter and only a short question of law is involved, office is directed to fix the main appeal in the last week of next month. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.