Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1981 P Cr. L J 402

MUHAMMAD AQIL vs THE STATE

Citation1981 P Cr. L J 402
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 566-Q of 1980
Date1981-01-26
Judge(s)Muhammad Rafique Tarar
ResultProceedings quashed

ORDER

Muhammad Aqil petitioner has moved this petition under section 561-A. Cr. P. C. For quashment of proceedings under section 41 P. P. C. Pending against him in the Court of Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Toor, Magistrate First Class. Lahore.

2. The case of the prosecution is that seven years prior 24November, 1978 a cycle belonging to Basharat Ali complainant was stolen from the graveyard situate at McLeod Road. Lahore. He did not make any report to the Police but got an entry made in the register of stolen cycles maintained by C. I. A. Staff. Lahore. 23November, 1978. Akbar Ali A. S. I., C. I. A. Staff, Labour recovered the cycle froth the petitioner and seized it under section 550 Cr. P. C. After the recovery, the complainant identified the cycle hip own and lodged report Exh. P. A. With Police. After the investigation the petitioner was challaned.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that petitioner inherited the cycle from his father who died on 26July 1977 and he had no knowledge that it was stolen property. He further submits that the recovery was made several years after the alleged theft, therefore, presumption of knowledge of stolen nature of property does not arise in this case and even if the prosecution version is accepted, no offence under section 411 P. P. C. Is made out against the petitioner. In support of his contention he has relied on Mukhtar Ali v. The State (PLD 1971 SC 725) wherein it was held:- The above observations conclude the matter. The case of the prosecu--tion taken to its best is that the cycle of the complainant was stolen and it was found in possession of the petitioner seven years after the alleged theft. The learned State Counsel concedes that the prosecution is not in possession of any evidence that the petitioner had the knowledge about the stolen nature of theth rd th cycle in the circumstances, there is no possibility of the conviction of the petitioner and continuation of the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of the Court.

3. I, therefore, allow this petition and quash the proceedings under section 411, P. P. C. Pending against the petitioner in the Court of Mr. Zulfiqar Ali Toor, Magistrate First Class, Lahore.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch