1. DCO/Authority through DDO (health) Sahiwal referred the claim U/S 23 (4) of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005 with allegation that the respondent Mst. Jannat Bibi being a quack, was involved in illegal medical practice.
2. The claim sent by the DCO/Authority was based on an inspection note of DDO health Sahiwal wherein it was mentioned that Mrt. Jannat Bibi was a "Dai" and not qualified to treat the diseases of female patients. The empty and used bottles were also taken by the DDO health, Sahiwal.
3. Mst. Jannat Bibi was present in the court in person. She was heard. Her person and personality were observed. She is old lady of about 70 years old. She is feeble not capable to provide medical assistance to any patient as "Dai". She even cannot hear and see properly. Medical certificate and medical card of Rahimia Free Eye Hospital shows that the respondent has some serious eye problems. I firmly believe that the lady is not fit enough to do any job to provide facilities to the ladies suffering from labour pains. It therefore can be said that the claim was filed on the basis of some misunderstanding /misconception. Further proceedings in the matter would be wastage of time hence the claim is filed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.