' KHALID MEHMOOD, J.---Petitioner Jamil has been arrested by the local police of Police Station Kotnajibullah in case F.I.R. No, 93 dated 13-2-2012 for alleged commission of offence under sections 302/ 324/353/186/13A0/34, P.P.C. He applied for post arrest bail before the courts below but the same was declined. Hence, this bail petition.
2. Briefly stated facts of the prosecution case are that on 13-2-2012 at 1900 hours accused petitioner and others committed Qatl-e-Amd of deceased Khanvez Khan A.S.-I. And also attempted at the lives of complainant and other police officials by firing.
3. Learned counsel- for petitioner argued that accused petitioner is innocent and has been falsely charged in the present case. It was argued that accused petitioner is the son of Sohail deceased, who was murdered by the local police and local police just, to save their skin registered the false case against the accused. It was argued that the investigation in the case is complete and person of petitioner is no more required by the local police. It was also argued that guilt of petitioner requires further inquiry.
4. Counsel for State rebutted the contentions of the petitioner and argued that accused petitioner is directly charged in the F.I.R. For brutal murder of Khanvez Khan A.S.-I. And attempted at the lives of complainant and other police official by indiscriminate firing and offence falls within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C.
5. Arguments heard and record perused.
6. Accused petitioner is directly charged in the promptly lodged F.I.R. For effective firing. Medical report fully supports the prosecution version. Accused resorted to indiscriminate firing, as a result of which Khanvez and Sohail died on the spot. They also attempted to commit Qatl-e-Amd of remaining police officials. Petitioner has been arrested on the spot along with .30 bore pistol. The empties recovered from spot were sent to Arms expert along with the recovered pistol, the report receipt in this behalf is also in positive. Prima facie accused petitioner is found reasonably connected with the commission of an offence, which falls within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. And does not deserve the concession of bail.
7. Consequently, this bail petition stands dismissed.