Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
โ€”

Abaid Ullah Goria Advocate S/o Sanaullah Caste Jut R/o Arfat Colony

CourtDistrict Consumer Court
Case No.139/11
Date2011-10-07
Judge(s)Muhammad Yousaf
ResultN/A

1. Abaid Ullah Goria, Advocate by profession has field the instant complaint with the accusation that on 21-10-11 he has purchased a Mobile Nokia 6700S in Rs.9000/- from respondent and a receipt was issued in his favour. According to the complainant, respondent has given warranty of 4 months that in case of any fault, it may be returned. Complainant's version is that on checking at home on the same day of purchase, mobile phone was found defective as memory card was not being installed properly whereupon on next day he went to the respondent's shop with the demand of return of defective mobile phone but it was refused and he was misbehaved. Complainant has claimed Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation for agony besides price of defective mobile and litigation charges incurred by him.

2. Respondent was summoned but no one appeared on behalf of the respondent inspite of service where upon ex-parte proceedings were taken against the respondent.

3. In ex-parte evidence, complainant has got recorded his own statement as PW1, while on documentary side purchase receipt Exh.P1, legal notice Exh.P2 and postal receipt Exh. "P2/1", registered envelop Exh."P3" with report have been placed on record.

4. Arguments of learned counsel for the complainant have been heard. Record perused.

5. Complainant while appearing as PW1 has corroborated the contents of complaint.

Through receipt Exh."P1" purchase of disputed defective mobile phone set from respondent is being proved. There is nothing in rebuttal and also complainant was not cross examined, so this Court has left no option but to rely upon the same, so complainant is declared entitled for return of of purchase price of defective mobile phone Rs.9000/- and on receipt of price, he will handed over the defective mobile phone set to the respondent. As far as the claim regarding compensation/damages is concerned, no evidence has been produced regarding loss which actually complainant has suffered. As such he is not declared entitled for the same. However, Rs.10000/- are also awarded as litigation charges. Respondent is directed to pay Rs.19000/- to the complainant within 30 days of announcement of this judgment. File be consigned to record room after is due completion.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch