' ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, J.---Aggrieved by bail granting order dated 5-6-2009, passed by learned Single Judge in Chambers of the High Court of Sindh, Bench at Sukkur, in Criminal Bail Application No,203 of 2009, this criminal petition has been preferred by the complainant in Crime No, 46 of 2008, Police Station Faiz Gunj, District Khairpur, to impugn the legality of the said order.
2. Making reference to the relevant facts of the case and contents of the F.I.R., submission of Mr. Ghulam Qadir Jatoi learned A.O.R. Is that bail granting order is not based on proper appreciation of relevant facts of the case. He, however, did not dispute that it is a case of two counter versions, as per the facts stated in the first F.I.R lodged by one Muhammad Ramzan and the other lodged by present petitioner, narrating two different stories of the same occurrence.
When confronted with the question of limitation, the criminal petition having been filed 22 days after the prescribed period of limitation for filing such petition against the impugned order, learned counsel has no plausible explanation to offer in this regard. Even in the application for condonation of delay moved under Order XXXIII, Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, which is accompanied with this criminal petition, no plausible or sufficient cause has been disclosed by the petitioner for not approaching this Court within time.
4. This being the position, this criminal petition is dismissed being barred by limitation. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.