CH. MUHAMMAD TARIQ, J.--- Through this application, the petitioner seeks her post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,182 of 2010, dated 4-3-2010 for the offence under sections 302/452/337-L(2)/ 148/149, P.P.C. registered with Police Station Satellite Town, Gujranwala.
2. The precise allegation against the petitioner is that she associated the co-accused who trespassed in the house of the complainant and attacked the complainant and her other family members with their fire-arm weapons and as a result whereof, Mst.Faheema Bibi was succumbed to injuries and some others were injured.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been implicated in the case as a consequence of wider net. Further contends that the petitioner has not been attributed any role or overt act except that she helped the assailants in opening the door of the house of the complainant party and raised lalkara. He further contends that the petitioner being a woman is entitled to the grant of bail.
4. On the other hand, the learned Deputy Prosecutor-General, Punjab assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant, has vehemently opposed the bail application and has contended that if the petitioner is released on bail she will tamper with the prosecution evidence. Further contends that the petitioner is involved in a case which falls within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. therefore, she is not entitled to be granted bail.
5. Arguments heard. Record Perused.
6. According to the contents of the F.I.R., the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner knocked at the door of the house of the complainant while the deceased Faheema opened the door of her house. The petitioner forcibly entered in the house of her daughter-in-law and raised lalkara. In pursuance of lalkara, the other co-accused fired on the inhabitants of the house and as a result. Mst. Faheema died and other people were injured. The record shows that the petitioner was arrested on 14-4-2010 but no recovery could be effected from her. The petitioner was shown empty handed in the F.I.R. and no overt act role has been attributed to the petitioner except that she has made a lalkara and entered into the house of the complainant. The Investigating Officer of A the case has also submitted that there is no other incriminating evidence available against the petitioner. The challan of the case has already been submitted in the Court. The involvement of the petitioner in the case could be a consequence of wider net, therefore without going into the merit of the case and the petitioner being a female is admitted to bail subject to her furnishing bail bonds in the sum of. Rs,200,000 (Rupees two lacs only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.