IMAM BUX BALOACH, J. - Heard the arguments of the learned counsel tor the appellant and Mr. Zahoor Shah. A.P.G.
2. Prosecution case is that the applicant was having poultry business transaction with the complainant Shad Ali Khan. The applicant/accused has issued a cheque No. 1160139 to the complainant for a sum of Rs. 12,0, 000/- which was bounced. Ultimately the complainant lodged the F.I.R, bearing Crime No. 355/2010 at PS Sharafi Goth, East Zone, Karachi. During trial the applicant/accused was arrested. The learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Malir, declined to grant bail to the applicant.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.G.
4. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the applicant has not issued such Cheque of Rs.
12,00,000/- to the complainant but a sum of Rs. 6,46,500/- of the complainant is outstanding against the applicant and a false case has been registered against the applicant/accused.
Admittedly during the course of investigation the witnesses have been examined under Section 161, Cr.P.C, and supported the prosecution case. Now-a-days, the issue of false cheques is increasing day by day and now persons are suffering difficulties/agonies and their business due to bouncing of the false cheques, collapsed. Such tendency is to be dealt with iron hands. If frequently bail is granted in such cases, it means, that a certificate is to be given to such person to commit such offences. The case has been challaned and is pending for trial, In such circumstances, applicant's case deserves no leniency. Hence I found no reason in this application which was dismissed by me by short order dated 28.02.2011 and these are the reasons for the same.