Pakistan Case Law← Search
PLJ 2011 Lahore 402

MUHAMMAD ANWAR and 8 others vs STATION HOUSE OFFICER, P.S. ATA-

CitationPLJ 2011 Lahore 402
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.W.P. No. 23286 of 2009
Date2009-12-15
Judge(s)Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry
ResultPetition accepted

ORDER

Through, the present constitutional petition, Muhammad Anwar etc., petitioners seek, quashing of FIR. No. 245/2009 dated 4.8.2009, registered under Sections 399/402 PPC at Police Station Ata.

Shaheed District Sargodha.

2. Briefly the facts of the case are that the aforesaid case was registered by the respondents against the petitioners with the allegations that they while being armed with different weapons were standing, at Pull Chak No. 112/ Janubi for committing dacoity and on seeing the police raiding party they tried to flee away but they were overpowered.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioners are law abiding respectable citizens of the country and the family of petitioners has a great respect in the vicinity but the local police on the instigation of adversaries of the petitioners family who are unhappy over respect of family of the petitioners is bent upon to ruin prestige of petitioners and their entire family; that on 3.8.2009 at 8.00 p.m. when Petitioner No 7 was present alongwith his other family members including, other petitioners in his house Respondent No. 1. alongwith 15/16 police officials while armed with lethal weapons forcibly entered the house of Petitioner No. 7 after breaking, the doors and started beating the inmates of the house. They also maltreated and humiliated the 'petitioners and while going they took alongwith them motor car bearing registration No SGP-1313 XLI Toyota Corolla and 10/11 mobile phones and cash amount and also detained the petitioners in the Police Station. Facing the above situation, one Muhammad Yousaf a relative of the petitioners approached the learned Justice .of Peace for the recovery of petitioners from the illegal and unjustified custody of respondents wherein a bailiff was deputed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and before reaching of the bailiff at the Police Station all the petitioners were involved in different criminal cases and that due to the aforesaid reasons the impugned FIR was registered against the petitioners which is totally false and fabricated. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that even if the challan in the impugned. FIR is submitted before the Court and the petitioners are tried no incriminating material would be available with the prosecution for conviction of the petitioners and in such, circumstances continuation of the proceedings in the impugned FIR would be a sheer abuse of process of law and wastage of precious time of the Court.

4. Learned Additional Advocate General has vehemently opposed this petition.

5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the contents of the FIR in which the only allegation against the petitioners is that they were standing while armed with lethal weapons for the purpose of committing dacoity. There is no touch stone with the police or the Court to read the mind of an accused that he was to commit the offence. The intention of an accused for the commission of an offence is only ascertainable from the acts which the accused perform before the commission of the offence. Here in this case it is the allegation against the petitioners that they were standing while armed with weapons. It is very surprising that how the complainant was able to read the minds of the petitioners that they were to commit dacoity. Law does not make the person having such intention guilty of an offence unless he takes some positive steps towards the commission of the crime because there is a possibility of change of mind at subsequent stage. Even if the impugned FIR in such circumstances is allowed to be proceeded with there is hardly any chances of conviction of the petitioners and at the end it will be a mere abuse of process of law and sheer wastage of precious time of the Court.

6. In the above circumstances, I do not find any probability or chance of conviction of the petitioners. Accordingly, I accept this petition and quash the impugned FIR No. 245/2009 dated 4.82009, registered under Sections 399/402 PPC at Police Station Ata Shaheed District Sargodha.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search