Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2011 YLR 573

MAHMOOD KHAN And Another vs THE STATE

Citation2011 YLR 573
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 432-M of 2010 In Criminal Appeal No. 511 of 2009
Date2010-08-24
Judge(s)Kh. Imtiaz Ahmad, Syed Akhlaq Ahmad
ResultSentence suspended

ORDER Criminal Miscellaneous No. 432-M of 2010. Through this C.M., Raja Muhammad Saddique/petitioner seeks suspension of sentence awarded to him by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Rawalpindi vide his judgment dated 24-11-2009 in case F.I.R. No. 243 dated 14-11- 2004 under sections 302/324/ 147/149, P.P.C. And 7 ATA registered at Police Station Kalar Syedan District Rawalpindi.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been convicted under section 302(b), P.P.C., and sentenced to imprisonment for life. He was also directed to pay compensation of Rs.1,00,000 to the legal heirs of the deceased persons. In default of payment, he was to further undergo 3 months' S.I. With benefit of section 382-B, Cr.P.C.

3. It is contended that the petitioner has not been assigned any specific role of causing injury to the deceased or the injured P.Ws. Although recovery of .12 bore Carbine has been affected from the petitioner yet it is without matching. Co-convict Abdul Majeed with similar role has already been admitted to bail by this Bench vide order dated 15-6-2010. The petitioner is behind the bar for the last more than six years and there is no chance of early fixation of main appeal for hearing before this Court. It is, therefore, prayed that the sentence awarded to the petitioner may be suspended and he be released on bail.

4. On the other hand, learned D.P.-G. For the State assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant opposed the C.M.

5. Arguments heard. Record perused.

6. Admittedly co-convict Abdul Majeed with similar role of indiscriminate firing upon the injured P.Ws. Has been admitted to bail by this Bench vide order dated 15-6-2010. This being so, the petitioner has also become entitled to the concession of bail on the principle of rule of consistency.

The petitioner has not been assigned any specific role of causing injury to the deceased. Although recovery of .12 bore Carbine has been effected fromThe petitioner yet it is without matching. The petitioner is behind the bar for the last more than six years and there is no chance of early fixation of main appeal for hearing before this Court. We, therefore, allow this application under section 426, Cr.P.C. And suspend the sentence of Muhammad Saddique/petitioner subject to furnishing of bail bonds in the sum of Rs.2,00,000 (Rupees two lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Deputy Registrar (Judicial) of this Court.

The petitioner is directed to appear before this Court on each and every date of hearing till the final disposal of main appeal.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch