M.A. ZAFAR, J. - Converting the Habeas Corpus petition (Crl. Misc. No. 123-H-09), Ghirlam Abbas and Muhammad Shamshad respondents Nos. 1 and 2 were allowed bail by this Court vide orders dated 3.2.2009. The operative par of the order reads as under:- "I convert this Habeas Corpus petition into bail after arrest application. Ghulamv Abbas detenue is complainant of case F.I.R. No. 804/08, dated 23.12.2008 for an offence u/s. 302/34, PPC registered with Police Station Saddar Arifwala regarding the murder of his father Niaz Ahmed, Ghulam Abbas and his paternal uncle Muhammad Shamshad detenues have been arrested by the police in the same very FIR, which was lodged by Ghulam Abbas. Police Officer recorded the statement of different persons, who have implicated the present detenues as an accused for the murder of Niaz Ahmed. There is statement of Mst. Yasmeen dated 25.12.2008 second wife of Niaz Ahmed deceased with whom he married in February, 2008 and in the said statement she has stated that first wife of the deceased Shahida and his son Ghulam Abbas came to her house and threatened that they would not give her any share from the property left by late Niaz Ahmed. There is another statement of one Sher Ahmed in which he has stated that he was sitting in Drawing room of Yasmeen second wife of Niaz Ahmed and he heard from the adjoining room that Haq Nawaz, Shamshad and Aslam were saying to Ghulam Abbas that they have done their job of murdering Niaz Ahmed and pay them the remaining amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- out of the total settled amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- and similar statement of Shafique Ahmed and Sher Ahmed real brothers of Mst. Yasmeen were recorded, who also stated the same thing in their statement. The said statements were allegedly recorded on 25.1.2009. The aforesaid evidence collected by the police against the detenues at the behest of second wife of Niaz Ahmed with whom she only married in February, 2008 are hot sufficient to connect the detenues with the commission of offence. There are reasonable grounds to believe that detenues are not guilty of offence charged with and they have been involved just to deprive first wife of Niaz Ahmed and her grown up children from the property left by her deceased husband."
2. The present application has been filed, by Mst. Yasmeen petitioner (another widow of deceased) seeking cancellation of bail granted to the respondents vide order dated 3.2.2009 in case F.I.R.. No. 804/2008, dated 23.12.2008 for offence under Section 302/34, PPC registered with Police Station Saddar Arifwala District Pakpattan Sharif at the instance of Ghualm Abbas respondent. The aforesaid order was passed after hearing Mr. Azam Nazir Tarar, Advocate, who appeared on behalf of brother of the deceased. The grievance of the petitioner is that she being widow was not heard at that time.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned D.P.G. There is no other evidence with the prosecution except the same, which finds mention in the order dated 3.2.2009.
For the foregoing reasons there is no good ground to recall the order dated 3.2.2009 granting bail to the respondents. Resultantly, the application is dismissed.