' HASNAT AHMAD KHAN, J.--Syed Riaz Hussain, the petitioner by submitting the instant application, seeks post-arrest bail in the case F.I.R. No,328/2009 dated 29-4-2009, registered at Police Station City B-Division, Sheikhupura in respect of the offences under sections 420/468/471 and 406, P.P.C.
2. In support of this petition learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the prosecution story is totally false and frivolous; that the complainant who is brother-in-law (Sala) of the petitioner, suppressed the material facts while lodging the F.I.R. And that the truck in question had been transferred by its owner in favour of petitioner's grandson on the asking of complainant's late father vide a letter 4-7-2008, a copy of which has been produced before me.
3. Conversely learned Deputy Prosecutor-General assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant has opposed this petition vehemently by submitting that the petitioner is guilty of forging a transfer deed purportedly executed by Bashir Ahmad, the original owner of the truck.
Learned counsel for the complainant further adds that the complainant is equipped with the original registration book of the truck in question.
4. Heard. Record perused.
5. Admittedly, the truck in question is presently in possession of the complainant, who is equipped with the original registration book of the said truck as well. According to the complainant the petitioner is guilty of forging of a transfer deed purportedly executed by Bashir Ahmad owner of the truck in question in favour of the petitioner. However, on Court's query the Investigating Officer concedes that the transfer deed allegedly forged by the petitioner has never been sent to the handwriting expert for comparison of the signatures/thumb impression of Bashir A Ahmad, executant of the said deed. He further concedes that the said Bashir Ahmad has never been joined in the investigation. In the circumstances, case of the petitioner, who has been languishing in jail since 11-5-2009, requires further inquiry. The petitioner has already been sent to judicial lock-up and, therefore, he is no more required for investigation purposes.
6. For what has been stated above, the application in hand is accepted and the petitioner is allowed the concession of post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in a sum of Rs,1,00,000 (Rupees on hundred thousand) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.