'KHAWAJA MUHAMMAD SHARIF, C.J.---It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.; that he was named in the supplementary statement which was recorded on 29-1-2009; that the petitioner was arrested on 22-6-2009; that Arshad co-accused who was named in the F.I.R. And was accused of ineffective firing was granted bail vide order dated 7-9-2009 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No,10580-B of 2009 by my learned brother Mian Muhammad Najam-uz-Zaman, J. (as he then was); that case of petitioner is of further inquiry falling under sub-clause (2) of section 497 Cr.P.C. And he is entitled to bail.
2. Learned DPG submits that petitioner is named in the supplementary statement but concedes that no injury on the person of the deceased or the P.W., is attributed to him.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. He was named in the supplementary statement which was recorded on 29-1-2009 i.e, about two months after the occurrence. No injury is attributed to him. His case is on much better footing to that of his co- accused Arshad who had been allowed bail by this Court. In this view of the matter, case of the petitioner is of further inquiry falling under sub-clause (2) of section 497 Cr.P.C. This petition is accepted and the petitioner is allowed bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,100,000 (one lac) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (J.) of this Court.