The petitioner Nazir Ahmad seeks pre-arrest bail in case FIR No, 61/2009 dated 14.02.2009, under Sections 324, 148 & 149 PPC (Section 302 PPC was added later on), P.S. Thangi.
2. It is inter alia contended that no specific injury either to the deceased or injured PW has been attributed to the petitioner even no specific role has been attributed to him. The conclusion of the- investigation, qua role of the petitioner, is that he snatched sugar cane from woman namely, Mst.
Bushra and required her to go home; that the entire family of the petitioner has been involved in the present case, which reflects malice and mala fide of the complainant.
3. Conversely learned DPG assisted by learned counsel for the complainant with vehemence opposes the submissions made at bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Arguments heard. Record perused.
5. The petitioner though is named in the FIR but no role has been attributed to him. He has been shown as merely present at the place of occurrence. The entire family stands involved in the case in hand by the complainant. In view of the above circumstances, the ad-interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the petitioner-accused is hereby confirmed subject to his furnishing of fresh bail bonds in the sum of Rs, 1,00,000/- (rupees one lac only) to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.