MIAN SAQIB NISAR, J.---The learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioner No,1 and the respondent are married, but are separated; she and the other petitioners (minor children for the parties) are living at Gujranwala where they have filed a suit for the recovery of maintenance allowance against the respondent, pending in the Court of learned Judge Family Court, Gujranwala, while the respondent as a counterblast has instituted a suit for the restitution of conjugal rights against petitioner No,1 at Lahore, which is on the cause-list of Mr. Muhammad Irfan Safdar, learned Judge Family Court, Lahore; he has also filed a petition for appointment of guardian and custody of the minors, which is pending adjudication in the Court of Mr. Hassan Ahmad, learned Guardian Judge, Lahore, therefore, under A the provisions of section 25-A of the Family Courts Act, 1964, the suit and the petition of the respondent are liable to be transferred to the Family Court at Gujranwala, where the suit of the petitioners is pending.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and find that in the light of the provisions of above said law, the suit and the petitioner of the respondent pending in the Courts of Mr. Muhammad Irfan Safdar, B learned Judge Family Court, Lahore and Mr. Hassan Ahmad, learned Guardian Judge, Lahore, respectively are liable to be withdrawn and transferred to the learned Family Court at Gujranwala, where the suit of the petitioners is pending. Order accordingly. Allowed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.