PERVAIZ INAYAT MALIK, J. --- Briefly stated facts as those emerge out of this petition are that the petitioner filed an application under Order I, Rule 10, CPC for being impleaded as respondents in a suit for specific performance of the contract already pending adjudication in the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Lodhran which was dismissed vide order dated 19.05.2008, whereagainst a revision petition was preferred which too was dismissed vide order dated 11.12.2008.
2. It is inter alia contended that the petitioners were necessary party and the learned Trial Court ought to have allowed the application filed by them and that the learned Additional District Judge, too has not appreciated the submissions made at bar in true perspective and that both the orders impugned have resulted into serious miscarriage of justice; that the same have been passed arbitrarily without proper application of judicious mind. Places reliance upon 1986 CLC 1165 "Ghulam A.I v. Hashim alias Hussaini and others", 1986 M LD 777 "Hassan v.
Central Government and others", 1986 M LD 195 "Salman Zulfiqar Mehdi v. Habib-ur-Rehman and three others", 1986 CLC 975 "Siraj Din and two others v. Additional District Judge Okara", and PLD 2002 Supreme Court "Ghulam Ahmad Chaudhary v. Akbar Hussain through legal heirs.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at quite some length and with his able assistance have also gone through the record. In all the afore-referred judgments cited at bar a law has been laid down that if in view of peculiar facts and circumstances of a case, the Court reaches a conclusion that no proper adjudication of a suit is possible without impleading such persons as parties, in that eventuality such an application should be allowed. The facts of all afore- referred judgments and the case in hand are distinguishable on peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. I am of the considered view that both the learned lower Courts after proper appreciation of facts and law on the subject have reached a just conclusion and rightly proceeded to disallow the application as well as revision filed there-against. Both the impugned orders are concurrent in nature besides, well-reasoned and perfectly in accordance with law on the subject. I am, therefore, not inclined to interfere in Constitutional petition. The petition, therefore, being devoid of any merits is hereby dismissed in limine.
Civil revision .