' UMAR ATA BANDIAL, J.---In the ejectment petition filed by the petitioner against respondent No,1/tenant, the respondent No,2 real brother of the petitioner landlord and joint owner of the demised property made an application under Order I, Rule 10, C.P.C. To be impleaded as landlord in the proceedings. That application was allowed on 23-11-2005 by learned Rent Controller and the petitioner's appeal there against was dismissed on 24-6-2006. In this petition filed against the said two orders, the tenant/respondent No,1 has been proceeded against ex parte on 14-9-2009. The respondent No,2 applicant before the learned Rent Controller has come before the Court and made the statement that he acknowledges the petitioner to be sole landlord in respect of the tenancy of the respondent No,1 in the demised premises. Accordingly he prays that he has no interest to join the ejectment petition filed by the petitioner which is pending before the learned Rent Controller in any capacity, whatsoever.
2. It is evident that two brothers have settled their dispute and on that account, a statement has been made to the Court by the respondent No,2 which is also reflected in the affidavit that has been filed in the Court today which has been tagged as Mark "A". Based on the statement made by respondent No,2, the impugned orders passed at the instance of respondent No,2 stand recalled.
3. Petition is allowed in the foregoing terms. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.