1. ORDER 1981 SCMR 820. In the case cited bail granted to the accused was cancelled by the High Court on the ground that accused who was granted bail and bad grappled with the deceased when another co-accused caused stab injuries but he had been arrested at the spot and was handed over to the Police. The Supreme Court did not interfere with the cancellation of bail in such circumstances. On the other hand the learned counsel for the applicant has argued that no injuries in the instant case have been attributed to the applicant against whom it is alleged by the prosecution that he caught hold of the deceased to facilitate the attack and further that there is delay in the filing of F. I. R., applicant was arrested after a long time. No recovery was made from him, there is a background of enmity between the parties, identification at the time of the incident is alleged to be in the light of torch and two out of three witnesses named in F. I. R. Are interested and related to the deceased. On the basis of this evidence it is urged that the case against the applicant for sharing common intention with the main accused under section 34, P. P. C. Is to be determined by the trial Court after the evidence is produced and evaluated, still then it is the case for further inquiry as such the applicant entitled to bail, In support of his contention the learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon 1978 SCMR 357, 1979 P Cr. L J Note 67 at p, 44, 197 P Cr. L J 758 and 1978 SCMR 285.
2. Ball granted. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.