' HAFIZ ABDUL REHMAN ANSARI, J.--- Through this criminal application under section 497(5), Cr.P.C.
Petitioner Ashiq Hussain son of Bachu Khan, who is complainant of F.I.R. No,241 dated 9-7-2009, registered with Police Station Sanawan, District Muzaffargarh, for offences under section 365-B and 366, P.P.C., seeks cancellation of bail of respondent No,2 Saifullah alias Kala, which was allowed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kot Addu, vide order dated 26-6-2009.
2. Learned Additional Sessions Judge in the post-arrest bail granting order thoroughly discussed the facts of the case and allowed post-arrest bail to him on merits. The learned trial Court observed that the respondent-accused did not participate in the alleged abduction. The suit for restitution of conjugal rights was pending before the Judge, Family Court. Copies of suit for restitution of conjugal rights, affidavit of Meena Bibi, judgment and decree dated 8-7-2009, private complaint titled Meena Bibi v. Mithoo Khan and her statement before the Area Magistrate were produced by the respondent. The learned trial Court came to the conclusion that in all the said documents the alleged abductee Mst. Meena Bibi admitted Saifullah respondent No,2, as her husband. Photo copy of the Nikahnamas between Rashid Khan and Mst. Abida Parveen and the other between Meena Bibi and the respondent were also produced before the Court.
3. Once the learned trial Court has exercised the discretion of granting bail to the accused, thereafter for withdrawal of the same concession special circumstances are required. Learned counsel for the petitioner badly failed to point out any stance of miscue of the concession of the relief of bail by the respondent. In the cancellation of bail petition it is not averred that respondent No,2 misused the same nor any affidavit of any independent witness about the misuse of the said concession by respondent No,2 is attached with this petition. Considerations for grant of bail and for cancellation of bail are entirely different.
4. I see no ground to interfere in the bail granting order passed by the trial Court. Therefore, this petition fails, the same is dismissed.