' SYED SHABBAR RAZA RIZVI, J.---The learned counsel seeks pre-arrest bail of the petitioners who stand implicated in F.I.R. No,150 of 2008, dated 16-5-2008, under sections 447, 511, 337- H(ii), 379, 148 and 149, P.P.C., registered at Police Station, Ghar Maharaja, District Jhang.
2. Briefly, according to the F.I.R. On 11-5-2008, while the complainant was working on his land, petitioners trespassed and started firing, he could save his life barely while hiding himself in the poultry farm. The petitioners/accused also took away his mobile phone and Rs.5200. The earlier bail application for pre-arrest was dismissed by this Court on 30-7-2008 on account of non- prosecution. Likewise, their bail was also refused on 13-6-2008 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shorkot on account of non-prosecution. The above two orders show that petitioners have been misusing extraordinary concession of pre-arrest bail. Even otherwise, petitioners are named in the F.I.R with a specific role. Prima facie, there is no element of mala fide. Their first bail application was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 30-6-2008 but in spite of A surrendering themselves, petitioners had been playing hide and seek by filing, application for pre- arrest and then not appearing as narrated above.
3. For the above reasons, this bail application is dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.