' SAGHIR AHMAD, J.---Petitioner seeks post arrest bail in case F.I.R. No . 54/05 dated 13-2-2005 under sections 392/458/411, P.P.C. P.S. Gaggo District Vehari.
2. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is not named in the F.I.R; that although in the F.I.R. He was alleged to be armed with fire-arm yet during investigation no such weapon was recovered from him, as such he has become entitled to the concession of post-arrest bail.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. Admittedly the petitioner is not nominated in the F.I.R. The petitioner is behind the bars since 27- 11-2006 without there being any progress in the trial; that according to the F.I.R. The petitioner was shown to be armed with fire-arm but during investigation no such weapon has been recovered from the petitioner. In this view of the matter after conclusion of investigation when the trial has commenced, nothing is to be recovered from him, further incarceration of the petitioner without any progress in the trial would not serve any useful purpose to the prosecution. Resultantly this bail application is allowed and petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,1,00,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Deputy Registrar (Judl) of this Bench. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.