Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks post-arrest bail of the petitioner in FIR No, 575/08 dated 19.05.2008 under Sections 17 and 22 E.O 1979 registered at P.S. FIA, Gujranwala.
2. According to the FIR, 67. persons were deported from Turkey. One of the deportees Shakeel Ahmad reported that he had paid Rs, 3 lac to the present petitioner to make arrangements for his emigrkion to Greece. Thereafter, the petitioner sent the deportee, Shakeel Ahmad, without legal documents to Turkey; where he was arrested and eventually deported.
3. The learned counsel submits that petitioner has returned money to the said deportee which he had fleeced from him. Deportee Shakeel Ahmad himself is present in Court and states that the money which he had paid to the petitioner has been returned to him by the petitioner, therefore, petitioner may be granted bail.
4. On the other hand, the learned Standing Counsel for Federal Government, submits that petitioner is a habitual offender and three other cases of similar nature stand registered against him.
5. I have considered the above contentions. The statement of learned counsel for the petitioner and deportee Shakeel Ahmad clearly establish that petitioner had obtained the amount alleged in the FIR thus committed the offences. The offences committed by him are not compoundable. This Court does not function to adjust the convenience or desires of parties but only in accordance with law and within confines of law, The offences which are not compoundable, they affect adversely the whole society besides any individual, like, in present case, above mentioned deportee.
Moreover, petitioner is involved in three more cases of similar nature which fact cannot be overlooked either. For the above reasons, this bail application is dismissed.