Pakistan Case Law← Search
PLJ 2009 Cr.C. (Peshawar) 51

SAEEDULLAH and another vs STATE and another

CitationPLJ 2009 Cr.C. (Peshawar) 51
CourtPeshawar High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. Bail Petition No, 69 of 2008
Date2008-05-14
Judge(s)Muhammad Alam Khan
ResultBail accepted

This is an application for bail filed by the accused/petitioners Saeedullah and Zaman, sons of Zakim Khan, in case FIR No, 31 dated 27.2.2008 of Police Station Paroa, District D.I. Khan, initially registered under Sections 457/380 PPC with subsequently added Section 411 PPC as their efforts for the same relief have been proved abortive before the learned lower Courts vide orders dated 7/3/2008 and 13/3/2008 respectively.

2. According to the FIR lodged by the complainant Hafeezullah Khan on 27/2/2008 at 1110 hours on the last night he alongwith his children were asleep in the house while the cattle were tied in the cattle room. When he woke up in the evening, he saw the doer of the cattle room opened and on entering there found missing a buffalo of black colour and one of a white colour, both valuing ninety thousands but none was charged for the offence. However, subsequently during the investigation of the case, the accused/petitioners were booked for the offence who after their arrest applied for bail but could not succeed in the lower fora and hence this petition.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and examined the available record.

4. From perusal of the available record it reveals that prima facie, the accused/petitioners at the most, could be booked for an offence under Section 411 PPC, the punishment, wherefor provided under the law is not hit by the prohibition contained under Section 497 Cr. P.C. and is bailable.

Similarly, it is not the principle of law that the maximum sentence provided for an offence should be kept in mind while granting bail to the accused if the Court on the data discernable from the record conies to the conclusion that no maximum punishment could be awarded to the accused/petitioner, the concession of bail could be extended to him in the given circumstances.

Thus while tentatively assessing the case of the accused/petitioners, it goes out of the embargo contained under Section 497 Cr. P.C. and is held to be of further inquiry.

5. Consequently, this application is accepted and the accused /petitioners are directed to be 'released on bail provided they furnish bad bonds in the sum of Rs, 1,00,000/- (Rs, one lac) with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of llaqa/Judicial Magistrate, who shall ensure that the sureties are local. reliable and men of means.

Above are the reasons for my short order of even date.

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search