Pakistan Case Law← Search
PLJ 2009 Cr.C. (Lahore) 820

RIAZ AHMAD and another vs STATE and another

CitationPLJ 2009 Cr.C. (Lahore) 820
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. No, 1280-B of 2008
Date2008-09-29
Judge(s)Muhammad Khalid Alvi
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

Petitioners Riaz Ahmad and Basharat seek bail after arrest in case FIR. No, 155/2007 dated 3.5.2007 under Sections 302, 324, 109, 34 PPC registered at Police Station Kameer District Sahiwal.

2. Precisely, the specific role as per FIR attributed by the complainant is that petitioners along with Sajjad had instigated the principal accused Dawood to kill his father and brother.

3. It is contended that petitioners are behind the bars for more than one year. It is further submitted that petitioners have no reason or object or motive to instigate Dawood co-accused to kill his real father and brother.

4. On the other hand, learned DPG assisted by learned counsel for the complainant contends that Mst. Shamas Tahira daughter of the deceased and sister of the complainant and Dawood co- accused under Section 161 Cr.P.C. categorically stated' that Basharat petitioner caused fire-arm injury to the deceased. It is further added that complainant has also filed a complaint against the present petitioners in which the petitioners have been summoned.

5. I have considered the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties.

6. Complainant has given every detail of the incident in the FIR in which he categorically stated that apart from Dawood- no other accused was identifiable. He specifically named the present petitioners that they had advised Dawood co-accused to kill the deceased. Meaning A thereby that, prima facie, it appears that statement of Mst. Shamas Tahira was recorded to implicate Basharat petitioner in the' actual occurrence whereas according to the complainant he was not present. In this view of the matter, case of the petitioners requires further inquiry. They are accordingly admitted to bail subject to their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs, 1,00,000/- (Rupees one hundred thousand only) each with one surety each in the like amount to the

For educational and research use only β€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerΒ·PrivacyΒ·TermsΒ·Search