Pakistan Case Law← Search
PLD 2009 Lahore 218

NOOR HUSSAIN vs CHIEF PROSECUTOR GENERAL, PUNJAB and 5 others

CitationPLD 2009 Lahore 218
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petitions Nos.4697 and 12508 of 2008
Date2008-10-28
Judge(s)Syed Shabbar Raza Rizvi
ResultPetition allowed

ORDER

SYED SHABBAR RAZA RIZVI, J.---According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Deputy Prosecutor-General vide his note dated 15-3-2008 recommended that accused be challaned and supplementary challan be submitted before the competent court. The said recommendation was also approved by the Prosecutor-General, Punjab. The controversy relates to F.I.R. No,338 of 2005 dated 20-10-2005 at Police Station Civil Lines, Sialkot. In initial investigation, the accused were fond innocent. Subsequently, the investigation was entrusted to Ghulam Muhammad Kalyar, SSP/Investigation. However, respondent No.4 moved an application for legal opinion from DSP Legal.

2. The controversy is that whether after opinion of the Prosecutor-General, submission of challan could be kept pending on pretext of seeking an opinion form DSP Legal? Whether opinion of DSP Legal was required?

3. The people forget that opinion of first Investigating Officer or second Investigating Officer does not make any accused person guilty or innocent. The job of the Investigating Officer is to collect some material and to place it before the concerned court which decides after giving opportunity to the parties, the fate of a criminal case. Only a competent court can declare whether a person is guilty or innocent but not (a) Investigating Officer or (b) yet people waste time and delay legal proceedings to get favourable opinion of Investigating Officer. This point has been explained lucidly by a Full Bench of this Court reported in, PLD 2005 Lahore 470.

4. After enactment of Punjab Criminal Prosecution Service, 2006, every man in the legal profession, one way or other, knows that Prosecutor-General is incharge of prosecution in the Province. The learned Assistant Advocate-General, Punjab has rightly pointed out section 9 of the above enactment, he is also supported by the learned Deputy Prosecutor-General. In the above circumstances, seeking opinion from DSP Legal, is either male fide or total ignorance of law of the concerned police officer.

5. The Provincial Police Officer/IG Punjab is directed to seek explanation in this regard from Mehmood Ahmad Khan, S.I. Police Station Civil Lines Sialkot/SHO Civil Lines, Sialkot and DSP Legal, Sialkot. This writ petition is allowed. The DPO Sialkot is directed to make sure that challan or supplementary challan is submitted before the competent court in the light of the final investigation conducted by Ghulam Muhammad Kalyar, SSP/Investigation which was also approved by the Prosecutor-General vide order dated 1-3-2008.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search