Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2009 YLR 180

NASIR IQBAL BUTT and others--Petitioners vs Mst. SURRIYA BEGUM

Citation2009 YLR 180
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Civil Revision No,51 of 2008
Date2008-09-15
Judge(s)Mian Saqib Nisar
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

'MIAN SAQIB NISAR, J.--- Learned counsel for the defendants/ petitioners contends that if permitted to make amendment as proposed in the application under Order VI, Rule 17, P.P.C., which has been dismissed by the learned trial Court vide impugned order, dated 5-12-2007, the petitioners shall not lead any further evidence, either oral or documentary. This offer has been accepted A by the learned counsel for the respondent.

2. In the light of above, let the petitioners file amended written statement in the trial Court within ten days from today without fail. As the order has been dictated in presence of learned counsel for the parties, therefore, any time consumed in obtaining the certified copy of this order, shall not be excluded from ten days period, otherwise, the petitioner shall not be allowed to file the amended written statement, as there is strong protest on part of the respondent's side alleging delay in the matter by the petitioners, which allegation has been denied by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

3. Be that as it may, this revision petition stands disposed of in terms of the agreement between the parties. As regards the miscellaneous applications filed by the respondent are concerned, suffice it to say that as the main revision petition is being disposed of therefore, the miscellaneous applications are also disposed of. Let the respondent agitate the matter therein, if so legally permissible, before the learned trial Court.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch