PERVAIZ INAYAT MALIK, J. --- The petitioner Muhammad Yaqob through this Constitutional petition assails the judgment and decree dated 15.9.2008 passed by learned Civil Judge, Burewala and dated 19.11.2008 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Burewala, District Vehari.
2. Briefly stated facts as those emerge out of this petition are that Mst. Naseem Bibi-respondent No. 3 filed a suit for maintenance allowance as well as dower amount against the petitioner, which was contested by him by filing written statement.
The issues were framed and after recording evidence of both the parties vide the impugned judgment and decree dated 19.5.2008 dismissed that suit for maintenance allowance to the extent of respondent No. 3- Mst. Naseem Bibi. However, decreed the same to the extent of respondent No. 4 minor daughter of the parties. The suit of respondent for "Haq-ul-Mehr" was also dismissed where against respondent. No. 3 preferred an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, Burewala. Likewise the petitioner also preferred an appeal against the same judgment which were consolidated and through the impugned judgment and decree dated 19.1.2008 appeal filed by respondent No. 3 was allowed whereas that of the petitioner was dismissed.
3. It is inter alia contended that the impugned judgments and decrees passed by both the learned Courts below have been passed arbitrarily and without proper appreciation of evidence on record; that the learned lower Courts did not advert to submissions made at bar on behalf of the petitioner. The behaviour of respondent No. 3 disentitles her from the maintenance allowance and other . Relief which has been granted to her. Lastly contends that since respondent No. 4 Mst. Sania was born after one year and 10 months of the divorce, therefore, no maintenance could be claimed even for her from the petitioner and that the respondent No. 3 had no locus standi to file the suit.
Against the petitioners and prays that this petition be allowed and both the impugned judgments and decrees be set aside.
4. Arguments heard. Record perused.
5. I find that all the points agitated before this Court have exhaustively been dealt with by both the learned Courts bellow and have properly been discussed and appreciated. The impugned judgments and decrees on principle are not only concurrent in nature but are well-reasoned, besides, no material irregularity or illegality or misreading or non-reading worth mentioning has even been pointed out. I also find that the learned Additional District Judge has justifiably corrected the part of the impugned judgment and decree, passed by Judge Family Court. The same is well-reasoned and perfectly in accordance with law, which is hereby up-held. This petition, therefore, being devoid of any merits is hereby dismissed in limine. No order as to costs.