JUDGMENT KHURSHID ANWAR BHINDER, J. - The petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No, 300/2008, registered under Section 365-B, P.P.C, at police. Station Sadar Sheikhupura.
2. Precise allegations against the petitioner as per narration of F.I.R, are that he alongwith his accomplices had abducted Mst. Nazia Bibi, daughter of the complainant and had forcibly contracted her marriage with his brother.
3. Learned. Counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a false case registered against the petitioner as a matter of fact no such occurrence has -ever taken place. The alleged abductee Mst. Nazia had contracted marriage with the brother of petitioner with her free will and consent and. Sor did she state before the I.O. In her statement recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C, that nobody had abducted her rather she has contracted marriage with the brother of the petitioner with her free will and consent. He further submits that Mst. Nazia is sui juris and is pregnant for four months, therefore, in view of -her statement no offence has been committed by the petitioner and is therefore liable to be released on bail.
4. Learned D.P.G, does not seriously oppose bail application, of the petitioner and submits that Mst.
Nazia, the alleged, abductee, has stated, before the J.Q. In herstatement recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C, that nobody has abducted her rather she -has contracted marriage with the brother of petitioner with her free will and consent.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned D.P.G, and have also perused the record. The petitioner is no doubt nominated in the F.I.R, with specific role of abduction but I am afraid the alleged abductee Mst. Nazia had stated before the I.O. In her statement recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C, that nobody had abducted her rather she has contracted marriage with the brother of the petitioner with her free will and consent. As far as question of her being sui juris is concerned, it has been established from the record as produced by the I.O. The Mst. Nazia is pregnant for about four months out of marriage took place between the brother of the petitioner and the alleged abductee, therefore, question of her being sui juris does not arise, as she is already pregnant, it is worth mentioning here that a woman cannot get pregnant until and unless menstruation start occurring and it is sufficient to have menstruation to prove the factum of being adult, as pregnancy cannot take place until and unless menstruation starts. Since Mst. Nazia got pregnant, therefore, there is no question of her being, minor, In view of her statement made before the I.O. Wherein she fully refutes the allegations levelled . In the F.I.R, against the petitioner, therefore, provisions under which the present petitioner' is liable to be tried do not attract in this case.
6. Under the circumstances, petitioner's case is. That of further inquiry into his guilt. I, therefore, admit him to post-arrest bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate.
Petition stands disposed of.