' KARAM ELAHEE CH AUH AN, J.-In this case the parties have filed an application under Order XLIX, rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1956, praying that it may be decided in the terms of the compromise as contained in paragraph 3 of the aforesaid application. The application is accompanied by an affidavit of Mst. Murtazai Begum alias Naseem Begum widow of Syed Ali Abbas and the affidavit of Allah Bakhsh son of Chandia, respondent No, 1, in the case. According to this compromise the parties have agreed that "(1) the portion transferred to the respondents be allowed to remain intact ; (is) the passage 3'.1"x 16' be allowed to be used by both the parties i,e, petitioner and respondent No,
1. The other passage leading to the first floor transferred to petitioner measuring 4' x 11' is however the exclusive ownership of the present petitioner. The site-plan signed by both the parties is enclosed marked as "AA" ; (iii) the rest of the entire residential accommodation along with the small shop shall vest in favour of present petitioner". It is further stated that respondent No, 1 has undertaken not to interfere in the residential accommodation and shop transferred to Syed All Abbas (deceased) now represented by his widow Mst. Murtazai Begum. The application is also signed by the learned Advocates-on-Record for both the parties.
The agreement seems A to be quite lawful, apparently there is nothing to take exception to it. The present petition is disposed of in terms of the compromise as embodied in the relevant application.