1. ' This appeal has arisen out of an order dated 4th June, 1979 passed by the District Criminal Court, Rawalakot. By this order, Shafait Khan respondent was acquitted by the trial Court for want of proof.
2. It is asserted through this appeal by the learned Additional Advocate-General that the trial Court was unable to appreciate the evidence adduced by the prosecution and not only that but a number of witnesses who were produced by the prosecution were even ignored to be mentioned in the impugned judgment. This was a case under section 380/457 of the Penal Code read with section 18 of the Islamic Penal Laws Act.
3. ' The prosecution examined Hashmat Khan, the complainant, Mir Muhammad, Noor Akbar, S.M.
4. Ashraf Khan and Raja Muhammad Saeed Khan, Sub-Inspector who was the Investigating Officer of the case, as their witnesses and the remaining witnesses, namely, Fateh Muhammad, Hokumdad, Muhammad Roshan and Khani Zaman who were to be produced in support of the prosecution, could not be examined as two of them named Fateh Muhammad and Hokumdad were given up by the learned Public Prosecutor, taking them as unnecessary witnesses and the evidence of Muhammad Roshan and Khani Zaman was closed by the Court as the prosecution was unable to produce them. The articles stolen which were allegedly recovered at the instance of Shafait Khan accused-respondent from Muhammad Roshan and Noor. Akbar P. W. We're not revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.