' The facts of the case are elaborately mentioned in the impugned order passed by the learned single Judge in Chamber. The Hon'ble Judge categorically has observed:-- "The only question that boils down for determination in this writ petition is that the letter, dated 20- 12-2005 annexed with the parawise comments of the respondents said to have been written by the petitioner with his signatures is genuine one or not."
' The learned Judge thereafter has held that the question about the genuineness of the document cannot be determined in constitutional jurisdiction and in this regard, has relied upon plethora of judgments.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has not been able to convince us, if in the facts and circumstances, the factual inquiry about the said document is not required in the matter and that such exercise should necessarily be undertaken in the constitutional jurisdiction, therefore, we do not find any legal or factual infirmity in the order under challenge calling for interference in Intra Court Appeal. Dismissed.