' ZIA PERWEZ, J.--- This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the order, dated 2-4-2008 of the learned Single Judge, Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench in Regular Second Appeal No,4 of 2008, whereby the appeal was dismissed in limine and the judgments and decrees of the two Courts below are upheld.
2. After hearing the learned D.A.-G. For the petitioners, we do not find any ground calling for interference in the impugned order, whereby the delay in filing the first appeal against the judgment of the trial Court followed by the order of the learned Additional District Judge in Civil Appeal No,163 of 2007 dated 10-11-2007 dismissing the appeal on the grounds of being time-barred and for non-payment of court-fee even after sufficient notice. The said judgment was maintained by the learned Single Judge of the High Court and the aforesaid R.S.A. No,4 of 2008 was dismissed.
The learned D.A.-G. Has not been able to make out a case of any illegality or question of law arising out of the proceedings and in the absence of any ground, the present petition is devoid of any merit.
3. Accordingly, leave to appeal is refused and the petition is dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.