SYED SHAHEEN MASUD RIZVI, J.--- Through this appeal, the appellant has challenged the order 28- 6-2001 passed by the learned A Labour Court-9, MuRani wherein the grievance petition of the respondent was accepted and he was reinstated in service. The respondent had challenged through the grievance petition his termination from service by the petitioner. The case was proceeded ex parte against the appellant before the learned Labour Court. The main consideration with the learned Labour Court while deciding the case was that the respondent was not given charge-sheet and that the respondent was not given a fair opportunity to defend his case.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the notice was not properly served on the appellant and that the appellant is a civil servant and he should have gone before the Service Tribunal. Learned A.A.-G. Appearing on behalf of the appellant has not been able to explain the delay in filing the instant appeal.
3. Heard. Record perused.
4. Perusal of the record reveals that the instant appeal is 65 days beyond a limitation prescribed under the law although he has tried his best to explain the delay but I am afraid that administrative grounds cannot be made basis for condoning the delay. As such the appeal is dismissed as being time-barred. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.