Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1980 CLC 351

SHAHAMAD BAIG vs MUNAWAR SULTANA

Citation1980 CLC 351
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Transfer Application No, 205/C of 1978,
Date1979-03-02
Judge(s)Muhammad Ilyas
ResultPetition accepted

' This is an application for transfer of a suit for dissolution of marriage brought by the respondent, Mst. Munawar Sultana against the petitioner, Shahamad Baig, in the Court of Mr. Siddique Tabassum, Family Judge, Kasur. The petitioner seeks its transfer to Sheikhupura where his suit against the respondent, for restitution of conjugal rights is pending before a Judge of the Family Court, namely, Ch. Muhammad Aslam.

2. It has been alleged by the petitioner that some years ago he was manhandled by the relatives of the respondent. They extracted both of his eye balls from the "sockets" and thus deprived him of his eye-sight. According to him, they have now instigated her to file the above suit at Kasur so that they may take his life on his going to Kasur to defend the suit. The petitioner has revealed that the criminal case relating to the gauging of his eyes by the relatives of the respondent is pending decision in a criminal Court at Sheikhupura.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents contends that the Courts at Kasur have jurisdiction to try the suit filed by the respondent because at present she is residing there.

4. It is not disputed that the petitioner's suit for restitution of conjugal rights was instituted before the respondent had brought her suit for dissolution of marriage. In view of the nature of the two suits pending between the parties it can easily be visualized that they will involve some issues of common nature. Therefore, with a view to avoiding conflicting decisions thereon, it will be desirable that both the suits be heard and decided together by one and the same Court.

5. Now, the only question which requires determination is as to whether the two suits be heard at Kasur or Sheikhupura. Normally, in deciding such questions more care is taken of the convenience of the female party but since in the present case the male party suffers from a physical disability, namely lack of vision, he needs more accommodation than the other. I, therefore, transfer the respondent's suit from Kasur to the Court of Ch. Muhammad Aslam, Family Judge, Sheikhupura.

6. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch