Pakistan Case Law← Search
2009 YLR 1530

BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION vs PROVINCIAL OMBUDSMAN and others

Citation2009 YLR 1530
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.C.P. No,D-345 of 2008
Date2009-03-03
Judge(s)Khilji Arif Hussain, Arshad Noor Khan
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

' Granted.

2. Deferred.

3. Granted, subject to all just exceptions.

4&5. It appears that some complaint was filed against the petitioner in the Regional Office of Provincial Ombudsman at Mirpurkhas. After receiving the notice, petitioner appeared and filed his reply and as per learned Advocate proceeding was attended twice by the petitioner. The petitioner thereafter filed an application for transfer of case file at Karachi. The learned Provincial Ombudsman called the file from the Regional Office, Mirpurkhas to its office at Karachi. It appears that after calling the file, respondent No,3, who is complainant in the matter has applied for re- transfer of the case to the Regional Office, as the complaint is resident of Mirpurkhas. The petitioner's grievance is that the petitioner is an Educational Board and it is difficult for the petitioner to attend the proceeding at Mirpurkhas Office.

Be that as it may, it is for the petitioner to approach the Provincial Ombudsman and file a proper application, giving reasons why the matter should be heard at Karachi and not at Mirpurkhas and learned Ombudsman can pass appropriate orders on such application. The orders passed by the learned Ombudsman for hearing the matter at Karachi or at Regional Office at Mirpurkhas are of administrative nature, which normally could not be called interference in exercise of writ jurisdiction. The petition has no merit and is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search