Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLJ 2009 Cr.C. (Lahore) 305

ARSHAD ALI vs STATE

CitationPLJ 2009 Cr.C. (Lahore) 305
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Crl. Misc. No, 10629/B of 2008
Date2008-11-26
Judge(s)Muhammad Akram Qureshi
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

Arshad Ali petitioner seeks bail before arrest in case FIR No, 252 ted 18.6.2008 registered under Section 376 PPC at Police Station slouching District Faisalabad on the ground that there is delay of 3 days lodging of FIR which remained unexplained; that Mst. Nourine Bibi is it of 13 years, her age is 16 years. As per medico legal report of Mst. urine Bibi, no marks of violence were detected on her person; that abs were not found to be stained with semen. From these facts malafide of the complainant and falsehood of prosecution case is q clear.

2. Learned DPG for the State assisted by the learned counsel the complainant submit that the petitioner is named in the FIR an specific role of committing zina-bil-jabar is assigned to him; that witnesses and the alleged abductee have supported the prosecution can that the ocular account of this case is further supported by the medic evidence and that the assertion having been agitated by the learn counsel for the petitioner require deeper appreciation of evidence which is neither permissible nor desirable at the stage of grant of pre-are bail. They also submit that the pre-arrest bail is an extra ordering concession which is meant for innocent persons and the petitioner he failed to prove his innocence on the record. They further contend to the conduct of the petitioner is highly objectionable. He had been getting concession of pre-arrest bail and abusing the same.. This is 4th be application having been submitted by the petitioner before different Courts.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, this Court has noticed that the petitioner is named in the FIR. Specific part of committing rape with Mst. Nourine Bibi is assigned to him. From the contents of the FIR, the commission of offence under Section 376, PPC is made out which falls within the prohibitory clause a Section 497, Cr.P.C. The petitioner has not been able to establish tothe ulterior motives of the police or the complainant party.

4. Resultantly, no ground for pre-arrest bail is made out. The petition is thus, dismissed. Ad-interim pre-arrest bail already granted the petitioner is recalled.

Cited by 3 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch