' SYED ASGHAR HAIDER, J.---The learned counsel submits that the petitioner was condemned unheard, he was not associated with the proceedings, although he had vested right in the property subject-matter of this petition, he therefore, makes a simple prayer, that an opportunity of hearing be granted to him and thereafter the matter be decided, in accordance with law, by the respondent No, 1 .
2. The learned Additional A.G. Has reservation to grant of the request of the petitioner, according to him, the respondents have ample powers under the Land Revenue Act, to make and correct revenue entries, if they are satisfied that error has crept into record. In the present matter the applicant (Arshad Ali) was heard likewise the revenue officials were also summoned and they concurred to his viewpoint. However, the learned A.A-G. Could not controvert the assertion of the petitioner, that he was not granted opportunity of hearing.
3. Therefore, it is clear that the petitioner was condemned unheard, this is against the settled principles of law. Resultantly, this petition is allowed the impugned order is set-aside, the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent No,1 on 21-2-2008 who shall hear the petitioner and other stakeholders and thereafter proceed to decide the matter, in accordance with law, within one month of today.
4. A complaince report be submitted to the Deputy Registrar (Judicial), of this Court.